Trains.com

train vs cherry picker

2137 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
train vs cherry picker
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 9:51 AM
CSX coal train hits construction equipment north side of Evansville In. Monday 10/3. One fatality and 2 injured from the cherry picker,engineer injured by flying glass.Engine damaged on operator side.UP engines in use.Who pays for damage on loaned equipment?
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 1:10 PM
Depends.

If the accident is found to be the fault of the construction company, then they pay the damages, regardless of the owner

If the railroad is found to be at fault, then you'd have to go back to the run-through-power or lease arrangements between the railroads in question. But it would usually be the operating railroad.
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 3:03 PM
WAIT!!! Why would the engineer be hurt by flying glass? All new locomotives should have FRA standard 223 glazing which makes the windows un-shatterable.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 3:06 PM
No, it is shatter resistant, not bullet proof or un breakable...

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 4:02 PM
Oh, so shards broke off onto the engineer?

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 7:15 PM
I thought they used Plexi-Glass.
Andrew
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Mp 126 on the St. Louis District of NS's IL. Div.
  • 1,611 posts
Posted by icmr on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 8:30 PM
I posted a topic about this the day it happend.

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=46494

The UP engine was an SD90MAC.



ICMR

Happy Railroading.[swg][swg]
Illinois Central Railroad. Operation Lifesaver. Look, Listen, Live. Proud owner and user of Digitrax DCC. Visit my forum at http://icmr.proboards100.com For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Let every thing that hath breath praise the Lord. Praise ye the Lord. Dream. Plan. Build.Smile, Wink & GrinSmile, Wink & Grin
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by CSXrules4eva on Wednesday, October 5, 2005 9:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35

WAIT!!! Why would the engineer be hurt by flying glass? All new locomotives should have FRA standard 223 glazing which makes the windows un-shatterable.


I've always wondered what FRA 223 or another number glazing ment, now I know. I see it all the time on Septa's Silverliners in the cab in big black letters above the engineer. I thought it had to do with communications or something to that nature.

I do wonder, how the engineer got injured my shattered glass, I'm guessing something of considerable size must of came through the windsheild or the side window, to cause "glass" damage to the engineer. I also wonder if the glass on the side windows is just as thick or is it thiner than the windshiled glass. On cars, and trucks that is ususally the case. I don't know how it is for locomotives.

Well yet again I have to send out my blessings to the people and their families involved in this incident. God Bless.
LORD HELP US ALL TO BE ORIGINAL AND NOT CRISPY!!! please? Sarah J.M. Warner conductor CSX
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 6, 2005 1:06 AM
We have DOT Level 3 Safety glass in our armored trucks. The entire truck is rated for .44 Magnum. I've seen it after an accidental discharcharge of a .45 (probably some low power, definately inexpensive round) from about 3 feet away. Spiderwebbed the nearest sheet, and that was about it. Though, we are a bit more mobile, and less powerful, as a locomotive.

James
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, October 6, 2005 6:30 AM
Max, exactly how many train accidents have you been involved in?
Ever had a 6" piece of oil well drilling pipe come through the nose of your locomotive?
If the arm of the cheery picker hit the front windshield, it would bust the "glass" which is actualy a laminate of glass and poly carbon film...the side windows are somewhat thinner.
Both break, but not in shards, they are designed to "bead up" just like an automible windshield...its quite possible that the engineer did get injured, after all, he sits only a foot or two away from the front glass and the beads do have sharp edges.

Ed
QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35

Oh, so shards broke off onto the engineer?

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 9, 2005 11:01 AM
Engineer injured by glass according to local tv news.Pictures showed severe damage to operator side of cab at windshield level.Thats all i know.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy