Trains.com

Cow and Calf Combination

3922 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Cow and Calf Combination
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 3, 2003 8:04 AM
Did Alco ever make a cow and calf combination like EMD did? Also was the Cow/Calf/Cow combination used often by any of the railroads that used them?
Larry
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Tuesday, February 4, 2003 5:09 AM
Oliver Iron Mining had two sets of cow/calf S-6 switchers.The Frisco made a calf out of a wrecked S-2 in1961.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, February 4, 2003 12:29 PM
How is the calf different from the cow - except for no cab? And do they only use these in yards or both yards and over the road?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 4, 2003 6:44 PM
Basically, that's the difference--no cab. The end that would have had a cab has some gauges thet should be visible from the cab of the cow.

They generally weren't built for speed, so transfer service was the best possible use for them. However C&O had some TR4s that they would use on mine runs, which had to use main lines for part of the trip, anyway.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, February 5, 2003 6:04 AM
Thank you for the information.

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Thursday, February 6, 2003 6:45 PM
Union Pacific used TR5s for a time as helpers on Cajon Pass.
COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, February 8, 2003 6:50 AM
BRC used TR2s and TR4s in pulldown and transfer duty and were probably the last cow-calf sets in daily service. They also were semi-permanently coupled with solid drawbars through their entire service on BRC. In later years, they were as much of a BRC trademark as the C424s.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 8, 2003 11:33 AM
While we think of switchers when we talk about cow-calf combinations, remember that a cabless "B" unit was in effect a calf, though not perminitly coupled, though some of the early F units were. So an early a-b-a combo with drawbars was a C/c/C combo.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:29 AM
IHB removed the cabs from at least five of their switchers, converting them to calves and numbering them in the BU series. I have seen lash-ups that included a calf sandwiched between two regular switchers. C&O had two TR3 sets which were a herd (cow and two calves).
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:36 PM
The IHB units had more than cabs removed...they removed the engines and made them slugs. IIRC, at least one other had nearly everything removed and was made into a fuel tender.

If you're a CSS fan, you might be familiar with those C&O "herds"--a few of their components came to the South Shore for a while, before the ex-C&O GP7s.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:00 PM
ok - keep it simple - I do better with babies than locomotives, but am I right - a calf is an auxillary power unit and a slug is? and a fuel tender is?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:37 PM
Hi Jenny,
A calf is a cabless booster unit. EMD's NW2 calf was the TR2, the SW7 version was a TR4, and the SW9 was a TR5, (tr standing for transfer)identical to therir counterparts with the exception of not having cabs, they were a complere locomotive, diesel engine, traction motors, fuel tanks, the works. They had a small control stand in the side to allow them to be moved by themselves. In essence, two complete locomotives controled from the lead (cow) unit.
Slugs are an engineless locomotive frame with only traction motors and a ballast weight,(weight added to increase traction) unable to operate under their own power, they are controlled by mu cables(electrical connections) from the lead unit, and draw all their electrical power from the lead units alternator. They are often home made, cut down from retired locomotives. Slugs are used when traction, not horsepower is needed, as in hump yard service. Slave units are complete locomotives, remotely controled from the lead locomotive. They are often refered to as distributed power, you see them in the middle of coal trains, and are used as pushers on the rear of heavy, long trains, they are controlled via radio. Slaves are often used as road units now, they have complete control stands, along with the capibality of being remotely controlled. The cow and calf reference is applied to switchers only, road units are refered to as A and B units, the B unit being a cabless version of the other.(B standing for booster) And a fuel tender is just that, a rolling fuel tank, some railroads gutted old switchers and locomotives, added huge fuel tanks and tried to use them to increase the distance a locomotive could go between fuelings. BN even converted a SD40 to run on LPG and natural gas, and added a tank car, semi permanent coupled to it as a fuel tender.
Hope this helps,
Stay Frosty,
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, February 14, 2003 10:25 AM
IHB has both calves and slugs, calves are numbered in the BU series and slugs are numbered in the PB series and 477-479. I am familiar with the South Shore herds which were leased from C&O and were returned when the GP7s arrived.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, February 14, 2003 12:26 PM
You're right, of course...I must have been thinking of CNW, which had slugs with the BU prefix. Sorry!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, February 14, 2003 12:33 PM
A slight elaboration (or correction) on Ed's thorough response. He's right in saying that TR2s (and TR3s) corresponded to the NW2s, TR4s to SW7s, and TR5s to SW9s. But the cab units, or cows for this thread, did have some differences from their single-unit counterparts--most noticeable of which were the missing lower windows on the rear of the cab. It apparently was enough to get them a new model designtion, TR#A.

One thing you'd never see on an NW2: CGW's TR2s had dual controls (the engineer could work from either side of the cab).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, February 17, 2003 6:14 AM
Ed: Ah! That about covers it. Thank you so much - The only one I have ever seen here and see now is the slave - imagine that in the land of Lincoln (NE that is) :)

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, February 24, 2003 10:27 AM
Two Alco cow-calf sets were used by Oliver Iron Mining (later Minntac) in mine service and may be the only factory cow-calf sets from Alco. OIM also had the only factory Baldwin cow-calf sets and a sizable fleet of EMD cow-calf sets.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy