Trains.com

EMD prime movers

1238 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
EMD prime movers
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 27, 2003 10:59 AM
I would like to know what prime mover and the differences between them for each EMD model from the GP/SD50 on up to the SD90's.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:47 PM
50 series had 645 engines, the turbo V16 rated at 3500 or 3600hp.

60 series had 710 engines, the turbo V16 rated at 3800hp.

70 series has 710 engines, the turbo V16 rated at 4000hp.

75 has 710 engine, the turbo V16 rated at 4300 or 4400 hp.

80 series has 710 engines, the turbo V20 rated at 5000hp.

90 series had 1265 engines, the twin turbo V16 rated at 6000hp.

The SD90/43MAC have the same engines as the SD75s.

The number 645 and 710 represent the cubic inch displacement of each cylinder. These are two stroke fabricated engines. The 1265 is a four stroke cast engine.

Nigel
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:48 AM
Good job, Nigel! It's nice to see an un-biased, yet well informed reply here once in a while. I almost didn't click on this topic, figuring it would be another "Ford vs Chevy" type B.S., But, alas, there IS intelligent life on this planet. Now, after I read a few more posts, please beam me up scotty!
Todd C.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:34 PM
How do they achieve the different hp ratings for the same 710 engines ? Fuel pressure ? Turbo boost ? Rated at A highr rpm ? Thank you !
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:46 PM
Is not the correct designation, 265H?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:19 PM
Dan;

Your are correct; 265H.

Nigel
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:21 PM
All the standard hot rodders trick are used: better breathing, more fuel, more air, better controls, but generally not higher rpm.

Nigel
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy