Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
GE vs EMD
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Gene, <br />As an engineer with CSX; I also prefer the EMD's anytime over a GE. I must clarify by saying that what engines I prefer are the old open style standard cabs. I do not mind the wide body's on the road......the air conditioning, when it works.........is great in the South. <br />Even so, in the deep summer I would always prefer an SD-40-2. They are the best motors for visibility. In the yard I prefer the EMD's as well. Switching is much more easy with the quick response of the EMD. The GE's do load slower. <br />The [new] UP 4000 series SD-70MAC is the best wide body by far. UP bought the units stripped down with conventional analog gages and no computers. Therefore the visibility is much improved. <br />CSX and other RR's will not buy any more conventional cabs. The wide bodys are here to stay. I am sorry for that. <br />A partial answer to why GE's are being purchased more is they have been building AC, Alternating Current Traction motors for almost a decade. EMD was slow out of the blocks on adapting to AC. For heavy tonnage, AC requires less motors per train. A typical 10,000 to 12,000 ton unit coal train on CSX has only two [2] GE CW44-AC's. <br /> <br />-len
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy