Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
4 stroke versus 2 stroke
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by edblysard</i> <br /><br />GE uses 4 cycle engines already. EMD is a 2 cycle fan, because there are less moving parts, less maintainance, and they rev really quick, less stuff to have to drag around the crankshaft. But it involves reed valves, instead of moving intake and exhaust valves, lifters, and rocker arms. The new engine for the SD90MAC is a four cycle. But the old standard EMD will be around for a long time, they are very, very hard to break. <br />Stay Frosty, <br />Ed <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Thanks Ed. Foe some reason I got the mistaken impression that the 4 stroke died with Alco. <br /> <br />Could be because the magazine seems to rely heavily on the opinion of *** Dilworth, and from the in print examples I've read to date, that former EMD employee is somewhat less than objective, in terms of both GE as well as those German HYDRO units tried by SP and Rio Grande. <br /> <br />As far as being an operator yourself, where does your opinion on 2 stroke vs 4 stroke fall?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy