Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
If that's what the Economist said, then the article is a screed, a diatribe, and arrogant. Or it got its information from a source with an axe to grind or with an undisclosed financial interest in a certain outcome. What makes you think railroads aren't interested? No insult intended, but if you approach railroads and railroaders with the presumption that they're antiquated, dimwitted, or complacent, I don't think you'll have a positive experience. There are substantive economic reasons that created the way things are done at present. I recognize that street legend says railroads are the way they are because of (check one) venality, stupidity, arrogance, greed, or all of the above, but street legend is self-serving and uninformed. Would you like to know why railroad transportation is the way it is at Chicago and other gateway cities? If you do, I and others would be delighted to answer. OS
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag