Trains.com

BNSF name and logo change

3500 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Washington
  • 409 posts
BNSF name and logo change
Posted by emmar on Thursday, June 2, 2005 12:58 PM
Does anyone else here think that BNSF should have stuck with their old logo? Their new logo is way to stylized and BNSF is a freight railroad and the new logo looks like a passenger line logo. Also why in the world did they change their name to BNSF Railway. It just does not roll off your tongue like a railroad name should.[v]
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:17 PM
It's all about corporate image. Now to me, the new logo just screams that it was designed by some skate punk wannabe, and doesn't belong within 250 miles of a professional railroad, but there are others out there that like it.

Personally, I liked the Heritage 1 scheme best of all, tolerated the H2's, and despise the H3's. Of course, I'm one of about 3 people in this world that thought the Grinsteins were good looking locos, too. To me, they were the epitome of professionalism. Not an over the top scheme, but a little more intricate than cascade green.

Of course, cascade green with tiger stripes looked pretty coo, too!

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:40 PM
I liked the tiger striped GP50s too. I picked up a back issue of CTC Board the other day that had a story in it on the entire paint scheme history of the BN. It was an interesting read. I never realized how many variations they had.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 7:05 PM
I think the new image will improve the business for BNSF. The old image did was OK but didn't really catch your attention. I think that the new logo will do this.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Thursday, June 2, 2005 7:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by emmar

Does anyone else here think that BNSF should have stuck with their old logo? Their new logo is way to stylized and BNSF is a freight railroad and the new logo looks like a passenger line logo. Also why in the world did they change their name to BNSF Railway. It just does not roll off your tongue like a railroad name should.[v]

Yes. the BN & SF should have stuck with thier old logos ( The "s" is intentional).
Burlington Northern Railroad.
Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway.







Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 7:31 PM
What are all you complaining about? It's no DUMBER than UP's WE WILL DELIVER....
Logo. UP & BNSF are the only two Railroads that are aplying these new logo's while CSXT & NS are not. Now what's wrong with this picture?
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Washington
  • 409 posts
Posted by emmar on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jterpstra

I think the new image will improve the business for BNSF. The old image did was OK but didn't really catch your attention. I think that the new logo will do this.


I have to disagree. I don't think that the new logo is going to improve business for BNSF. The logo just does not fit with BNSF's image. That and I don't think it looks very good on the side of a locomotive.
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Illinois
  • 484 posts
Posted by joegreen on Thursday, June 2, 2005 10:06 PM
QUOTE: UP & BNSF are the only two Railroads that are aplying these new logo's while CSXT & NS are not. Now what's wrong with this picture?


There is nothing wrong with this picture because BNSF & UP are bigger and better railroads than CSX & NS.
www.12ozprophet.com
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Rock Springs Wy.
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by miniwyo on Friday, June 3, 2005 12:26 AM
Didn't NS just change thier logo slightly? Somthing about a horse head?

RJ

"Something hidden, Go and find it. Go and look behind the ranges, Something lost behind the ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go." The Explorers - Rudyard Kipling

http://sweetwater-photography.com/

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, June 3, 2005 3:18 AM
I still think "Everywhere West" would be a great name for BNSF, and the logo should be a map of the USA with only the states served shown, and the principle lines shown also.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Friday, June 3, 2005 5:36 AM
OK, It is early in the morning, but I think it is an ink and paint cost issue.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE

BNSF

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, June 3, 2005 5:43 AM
I think BNSF should merge with NS and use the horse logo!

Begin throwing rocks!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,310 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Friday, June 3, 2005 7:51 AM
like it or not 3 more new engines with the new logos were heading to chicago on csx yesterday.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 3, 2005 8:09 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JoeKoh

like it or not 3 more new engines with the new logos were heading to chicago on csx yesterday.
stay safe
Joe
I could say something but I won't[(-D]. Was the BNSF in Black or Yellow?
BNSFrailfan.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, June 3, 2005 8:22 AM
At the end of the day, growth in business for a railroad/railway is secured by giving freight customes superior service levels at a very competitive price compared with other railroads and truck lines...PERIOD...not by adopting flashy new paint shcemes. Those paint schemes and logos and catchy slogans are adopted for the benefit of the general public, some of who may be investors looking to put their money into stocks they seem to like, and an IMAGE helps there, but NOT with moving freight cars to an ultimate destination faster and safely for less cost to the shipper.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, June 3, 2005 9:29 AM
Hey, at least they are painting their locomotives in a scheme. They could be painting them in the paint color that's the cheapest and applying vinyl lettering just big enough to be legal under the cab window:

BNSF
1234

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Washington
  • 409 posts
Posted by emmar on Friday, June 3, 2005 12:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

I think BNSF should merge with NS and use the horse logo!

Begin throwing rocks!

Mook


I can just imagine the logos and paint schemes they could come up with for that combination.
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 10 posts
Posted by markdbrungardt on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:50 PM
Perhaps, just perhaps, the long term stability of a company is reflected in the long term stability of it’s corporate logo. With only minor changes UP’s shield has held the position of corporate logo for over a century. What dose changing a logo every few years or so say to “you”, the public about a company?

That said, I have always favored the War Bonnet. Ten years ago I imagined a green and silver War Bonnet. Now that would have been cool. Love that Cascade Green.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy