Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
FRA Trots Out New Reflector Rule
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <br />If I am a railroad that owns few cars yet I receive many in interchange owned by others, and reflective tape is considered a safety appliance I will be on the hook for replacing a lot of reflective tape at my expense over time. I will need additional personnel, inventory of tape and tools (powerwasher at least) and track space on my R.I.P. track for these cars. All of this is at my cost. If I need to pass this through to my customers I will have to raise rates and won't see anything at ther bottom line. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Wouldn't the owner of the equipment be on the hook for the up-grades or repairs? <br /> <br />I know if a sill step or safety appliance is broken, then another railway will fix the item (for a price that is fixed by the AAR) then bill the owner of the equipment, wouldn't it be the same for reflectors? <br /> <br />--It's not like host railways don't have a lot of time to get the tape on there either, all new locmotives and equipment seemed to be equiped with the tape now anyway.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy