Trains.com

Amtrak Great Lakes Corridor

857 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Amtrak Great Lakes Corridor
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, March 17, 2005 9:43 AM
Having thought about this more, I have for so far decided that this would a great idea for Amtrak revenue boosting.

Great Lakes Corridor would serve intercity travel between cities in Ohio; Michigan; South Bend and Fort Wayne, Indiana; Chicago; Pittsburgh and in Ontario, Toronto, Windsor and London.

Possible routes would be

1/ Toledo-Cleveland-Akron-Youngstown-Pittsburgh

2/ Cincinnati-Dayton-Colombus-Toledo

3/ Toledo-Fort Wayne-Chicago

4/Toledo-Detroit-Flint

5/Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Detroit

6/Toledo-Detroit-Windsor,ON-London,ON-Toronto,ON

If the Canada Southern was by a miracle rebuilt, a Detroit to Buffalo route would be a great idea with possibilities with a stop at Niagara Falls,ON/ Fort Erie, ON (shuttle bus between Fort Erie and Niagara Falls for tourism purposes).

Some of thease route wouldn't make sense to use certain equipment other than a used RDCs that CN and CP must still have kicking around somewhere.

What does anybody else think about this possible corridor?
Andrew
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:29 AM
Holy Toledo!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:34 AM
Hey, Milwaukee's on a Great Lake too, ya know! Or maybe your plan wouldn't include already successful Amtrak corridors.
Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:52 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mikeyuhas

Hey, Milwaukee's on a Great Lake too, ya know! Or maybe your plan wouldn't include already successful Amtrak corridors.


Isn't Milwaukee already covered by Chicago Metra too?

I don't see why that shouldn't be included either. Thanks for the reminder.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,296 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:23 PM
Andrew
sounds like a great idea but for it to work amtrak would have to build alot of connecting track and have the big railroads upgrade alot of their lines.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Milwaukee & Toronto
  • 929 posts
Posted by METRO on Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:38 PM
Metra's coming to Milwaukee soon, or so they say.

As for a Great-Lakes Corridor, there'd be some customs hastles and I doubt that VIA and GO would be too happy about having more tracks taken up at Toronto Union (seriously that is one busy station) but...

It would give a great reasoning to rebuilding that beautiful station in Buffalo and the one in Detroit. I believe that all of the CN/CP RDCs went to VIA, and may not be on the roster anymore, but if you look at their sidings, you'll see they never throw anything away. So they are probably somewhere.

I wonder though, with the rust-belt loss of people if there would be enough traffic generated. Buffalo is a shell of what it once was, same with Flint, Erie, Toledo and many of the medium sized cities. Only Chicago, Milwaukee Detroit and Cleveland seem to still be large cities in their own right.

~METRO
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:15 PM
Toronto Union is going to have to be built up more anyways because of increased GO trains from Hamiliton and Toronto suburbs. Some of thease cities still have alot of commuters because of the industries around. The boarder is a pain that's why the Toronto bounds should only stop at Windsor, London and Toronto and nothing in between (Chatham, Brantford, Aldershot, Ingersol, Woodstock, Oakville) or the old route (Toronto, Brampton, Kitchener, Georgetown, Stratroy, Sarnia-plus a whole other slew of cities in the U.S) Stratroy Sub is too busy with CN traffic where the Chatham Sub (Windsor bound) is much less conjested.

I would add to my list of possible routes a Chicago-Milwaukee-Minneapolis-Winnipeg (optional) and Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati.

To JoeKoh, yes that would be quite expensive but if the U.S government would stop spending so much money on blowing things up, such a project would be a drop in the bucket in comparison and you would actually see something one could take pride in other than dead folk (not something I could take pride in).
Andrew
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,063 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:20 PM
Dream-on, dream-on, with great ideas, but meanshwile lets make the old college try to keep what exists!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy