Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
CSX vs. Amtrak 91 at Cayce, SC
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Uber"]Imagine a 45' low profile car designed to crumple and dissipate impact energy.[/quote]</p> <p>Crash energy management yes but low profile cars won't work. The tend to climb much easier than high cars. The accident at Red Oak comes to mind<br /><a href="http://bustrainandtrolley.wrongfuldeathconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/ntsbreport.jpg">http://bustrainandtrolley.wrongfuldeathconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/ntsbreport.jpg</a></p> <p>The new high-speed locomotive Siemens ACS64 is equipped with Crash Energy Management (CEM) elements for head-on collisions up to 25 mph. 50 mph is a four times higher crash energy. Theoretically it should be possible to design CEM elements for 50 mph. If it is practicable I doubt.</p> <p>There always will be crash scenarios that cannot be handled even with the best of crashworthiness designs.</p> <p>I think existing locomotives can't get retrofitted as the load carrying structure doesn't fit.<br />Regards, Volker</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy