Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Goodbye to ballast?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Paul_D_North_Jr"]We were confident of that tolerance, and that note was accepted, so "end of problem" as we say. In comparision, with the steel standard you cite, for the length of 43 m the tolerance would still be only 6 mm ~1/4 inch, so both of our tolerances are essentially identical. [/quote]</p> <p>Paul, I have been lucky and found the standard in internet which is very rare.</p> <p>There are too classes. The higher requrements are: L = Length<br />L < 30 m: 16 mm<br />30 m > L > 250 m 0,2 x (L + 50) mm L in meter<br />L > 250 m 0,1 x (L + 350) mm</p> <p>At 43 m that would be approximately 19 mm. But stricter tolerance requirements are possible.<br />Regards, Volker</p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy