Convicted OneA television with a broken remote control is less enjoyable than a television with a fully functional remote,
Back in the day, you had to feed them, too. Oh, wait, that was us when we were kids...
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Ah, when you had the old turret tuners, you HAD to get up and go to the set to change channels. Such hard lifes we now lead.
CSSHEGEWISCH It's a shame that a remote has gotten more complex lately. I think that you can do everything with your remote except improve the quality of programming.
It's a shame that a remote has gotten more complex lately. I think that you can do everything with your remote except improve the quality of programming.
AMEN, brother!!!
_____________
"A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner
Electroliner 1935Such hard lifes we now lead.
It's been quite a while since I had a TV with an on-board tuner control.
Last several hjave been ~remote only~, so the broken remote presents unique hardship.
Sorta like a forum having features that no longer function.
EuclidSo getting back to my point on the previous page, how do we know that any of the buggy behavior experienced on this website is caused by I.T. problems within this website? In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here?
In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here?
Because here is here.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
BaltACD Euclid So getting back to my point on the previous page, how do we know that any of the buggy behavior experienced on this website is caused by I.T. problems within this website? In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here? Because here is here.
Euclid So getting back to my point on the previous page, how do we know that any of the buggy behavior experienced on this website is caused by I.T. problems within this website? In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here?
Here is here + Windows operating system. Buggy behavior can emerge here from causes here. Or buggy behavior can emerge here from causes in Windows 10.
How do you know the source of the buggy behavior?
Euclid BaltACD Euclid So getting back to my point on the previous page, how do we know that any of the buggy behavior experienced on this website is caused by I.T. problems within this website? In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here? Because here is here. Here is here + Windows operating system. Buggy behavior can emerge here from causes here. Or buggy behavior can emerge here from causes in Windows 10. How do you know the source of the buggy behavior?
Since I have had machines that have operated on Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8.5 and Windows 10 - and the bugs have shown up in Kalmbach IT operated sites but not the other sites which these machines accessed I would tend to believe the Kalmbach IT operated sites were the problem. I have not gotten a Windows 11 machine.
If you access 1001 sites and only have 'buggy' operations at one particular site do you feature that the other 1000 sites are the sites that have 'bugs'?
I make no assertions about Kalmbach IT sites operations with non-Windows operating systems, as all the operating systems I have used have been one or another form of Windows.
EuclidIn other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here?
Your point is a valid one, I'm sure that ~sometimes~ the reported problem is on the client (member) side. Over aggressive security (browser) settings, obsolete cookies, cookies turned off.
However, I use MS Windows, and two different versions of linux, which also includes 3 different browsers.
And when something that has been working fine for months, suddenly stops working on all combinations of software that I try to access this place with....and the problem is only on this site.....it really narrows the field down.
I'm usually not one to complain at the first instance of a problem either. But after allowing several hours for routine trouble shooting to runn it's course, and nothing improves, regardless of what software I'm using......then it's time to proceed to the next step, post here to see if other users are having similar experiences.
If others are having the same problem and their just started too...it's extremely unlikely to be a client issue.
One other item is worth mentioning...Different (brand) browsers render pages differently.
Chrome might render an upgraded website just fine, Microsoft Internet Explorer too, While Firefox renders it just enough differently that sloppy coding causes a page to appear wrong (or not at all)
It's the web author's responsibility to verify that his end product works adequately across all current platforms. Sometimes they assume too much.
Which, while we are on that subject, there is an old axiom among I.T. that any problem on their end must affect ALL users...they like to think that unless ALL users are complaining...then any "problems" only scantly reported are necessarily on the user's end.
Until you sort it out that "only Mac users" or "only Chrome users" are experiencing the problem.
Convicted One Euclid In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here? Your point is a valid one, I'm sure that ~sometimes~ the reported problem is on the client (member) side. Over aggressive security (browser) settings, obsolete cookies, cookies turned off. However, I use MS Windows, and two different versions of linux, which also includes 3 different browsers.
Euclid In other words, why is it assumed that problems that appear here are caused here?
Sorry to hear that you are experiencing MS Frustration 3.0...it's a common malady.
I really do not like Windows. Version 7 was about the only one I really cared for, so that is my back up. When I absolutely MUST use Windows, that's what I fall back to.
Have you considered Linux? The transition is at first a little bumpy, while you adjust to the new architecture. And Linux help forums are generally festering with misanthoropes who will spend 15 minutes telling you they are too busy to furnish a 2 word answer to your simple question.
But after the burn-in phase it's pretty nice.
Convicted One Sorry to hear that you are experiencing MS Frustration 3.0...it's a common malady. I really do not like Windows. Version 7 was about the only one I really cared for, so that is my back up. When I absolutely MUST use Windows, that's what I fall back to. Have you considered Linux? The transition is at first a little bumpy, while you adjust to the new architecture. And Linux help forums are generally festering with misanthoropes who will spend 15 minutes telling you they are too busy to furnish a 2 word answer to your simple question. But after the burn-in phase it's pretty nice.
From what I have read, most people think Win 7 was the best OS ever, and that Win 10 is the worst ever. With the pre-Win10 operating systems, I would just start the computer and everything is ready to go. Just get an icon on the desktop and start work. Now with Win 10, it is like having a roommate. I hear that they will soon charge people for it like a utility bill. Now you have to register with an account and sign in about every 15 minutes. And the instructions to set that up are byzantine.
Anyone that thinks Windows 10 is bad, never had to deal with Vista or Windows 8.5
I've said it before, but I still miss XP.
Convicted OneIt's the web author's responsibility to verify that his end product works adequately across all current platforms. Sometimes they assume too much.
As the wire chief used to say, "TROUBLES LEAVING HERE FINE"
EuclidFrom what I have read, most people think Win 7 was the best OS ever, and that Win 10 is the worst ever.
I cut my teeth on IBM OS/2, and had a 10 year enterprise involvement with it. Got spoiled.
Windows 7 was the only Microsoft operating system I ever used that didn't feel like a "toy".
Win 7 was on a laptop I bought, and was actually amazed that I wasn't offended by it.
When they tried to do the windows 8.x thing, I got a bad taste in my mouth quick.
BaltACDAnyone that thinks Windows 10 is bad, never had to deal with Vista or Windows 8.5
I was fortunate - somehow I was able to miss Windows NT... I kept my mouth shut and wasn't forced to use it. It was a nightmare to set up - drivers for virtually everything had to be manually loaded.
My first experience with setting up machines for networks was Windows 3.11. W3.1 wouldn't do networking. Like NT that followed it, drivers had to be manually loaded. No plug and play, for sure.
My advisor at the community college had a daughter who worked for Apple. She got for him an Apple Lisa - among the first computers with a graphical interface, and my introduction to a mouse and it's accompanying cursor. Color me amazed!
Of course, today I've got to work with a vendor to straighten out a program for programming a radio I just bought. His long distance help via email hasn't helped so far. Hopefully we get that straightened out.
I tried to make a comment a minute or so ago and got a "403" code.
Forget it, I just don't care about this anymore.
Flintlock76I tried to make a comment a minute or so ago and got a "403" code.
On the other hand, I saw over a minute and a half wait while ad content said it was loading. And I have stomped on eight separate 'offensive content' ads since this morning...
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.