Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
May "VIA" Article
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
If you look at the financial figures for Via versus Amtrak you can see that Via still has a ways to go to catch up to Amtrak on the cost recovery ratio. It is important to remember that when Amtrak was receiving capital investment/funding/subsidy for the bi-level superliners Via was struggling along with steam heated equipment and old antiquated locomotives. Neither Via nor Amtrak is adequately funded. One thing that road loving governments could do to help railroads and motorists is to fund more grade separations so that the speed and the reliability of the speed will be increased for both freight and passenger trains. I have seen trains delayed for hours while police investigate why a motorist or pedestrian decided to ignore the crossing gates. I think both Amtrak and Via should focus primarily upon routes that can be covered in a day's journey ie: 14 hours or less. Just as decreasing the frequency by half reduces the ridership by more than half, the opposite is true when you add frequencies because of the increase in convenience. Lets have more trains!
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy