Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The side of the rail said:
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by ValleyX</i> <br /><br />Goodness, I should have expanded and given the entire explanation, there's really no mystery. There's no doubt that you're seeing what you're seeing but that rail could have come from anywhere. That isn't the original rail that was laid THERE in 1940. When these railroads abandon lines, take up track and replace it with welded rail, or replace old rail with new, they weld it up and take it someplace else. N&W and Southern have abandoned a lot of railroad that had perfectly good rail, I recall seeing entire rail trains with trees and weeds growing up in it when they ripped up most of the Cloverleaf between Frankfort, IN, and St. Louis, rail that was bound for the welding plant in Atlanta. Somewhere, that rail is an NS mainline today. I would imagine that a lot of the old Maumee District west of Toledo and Gary District between Montpelier, OH, and Chicago are somewhere else today, too. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Oh, ok..It just seems peculiar to (inexperianced) me, that they would have putt "undesireable" rail down as part of a right of way improvement on a main line, if "open hearth" is really that undesireable.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy