Trains.com

Whats the differance btn a "viaduct" and a "bridge"?

2988 views
25 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Whats the differance btn a "viaduct" and a "bridge"?
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Thursday, August 2, 2018 11:45 AM

The EL Starrucca Viaduct in Lanesboro PA is refered to as a "Viaduct" while the Detroit–Superior Bridge bridge in Cleveland which has a lower deck for a subway is refered to as a "bridge". Is Viaduct just a fancy term for a bridge?

Erie Laccawanna Bridge- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starrucca_Viaduct

Detroit–Superior Bridge-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit%E2%80%93Superior_Bridge

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Thursday, August 2, 2018 3:22 PM

I'll bite- a quick Google search yields this explanation:

viaduct usually refers to long bridges or series of bridges connected to one another by arch bridge structures that carries a road or a railway across a valley or a gorge. Viaducts mainly connect two points of the terrain which are similar in height in order to carry mostly rail and road traffic.

From the following website:

www.historyofbridges.com/facts-about-bridges/viaduct/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:06 PM

Why a duck?  Why a no chicken?

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:14 PM

CandOforprogress2

The EL Starrucca Viaduct in Lanesboro PA is refered to as a "Viaduct" while the Detroit–Superior Bridge bridge in Cleveland which has a lower deck for a subway is refered to as a "bridge". Is Viaduct just a fancy term for a bridge?

Erie Laccawanna Bridge- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starrucca_Viaduct

Detroit–Superior Bridge-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit%E2%80%93Superior_Bridge

 

Detroit Superior Bridge - the 12 concrete arch approach structures could be considered viaducts, but the steel part in the middle is a bridge. Typically in Engineering terminology, that makes the whole thing a bridge.

Here is the oldest and most famous railroad Viaducts, still in use:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Viaduct

A Viaduct is a type of Bridge.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:26 PM

a bridge is supported on either end.   One type of design of a bridge has an upper horizontal structure in compression and a lower horizontal structure in tension that minimizes bending.   this same concept is used in I-beams as well as aircrafter wing spars.   

Of course there are suspension bridges where the surface is supported from above

the surface of a viaduct is supported from the ground.  The Romans invented the arch to minimize the material used to support the surface.

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:45 PM

All viaducts are bridges but not each bridge is a viaduct.

A succession a number of bridges with short spans in relation to the total length the structure is called a trestle. If the spans are long, around 150 - 200+ ft, we have a viaduct.

The approaches of the Detroit Superior Bridge fit the viaduct definition, but as each approach span is an open-spandrel arch bridge, I would tend to arch bridge.
But that is disputable.
Regards, Volker

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:46 PM

This structure has almost always been known (and continues to be known) as "the viaduct" in Milford, MI:

Former Pere Marquette, C&O, now CSX.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Thursday, August 2, 2018 7:01 PM

I guess Viaducts are based on roman aqauducts

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, August 2, 2018 8:43 PM

I grew up in the New York area, and viaducts were always massive multi-arch affairs.  I moved to northern Michigan, and in Manistee County there is a road called Viaduct Rd.  I drove parts of the road a number of times looking for the massive works, but eventually realized that the single span girder bridge carrying the Ann Arbor RR over the road was the "viaduct".  The road narrows under this low clearance bridge.  It was the least spectacular viaduct I had ever seen.  Apparently in local parlance, a viaduct is any RR bridge that crosses over a road.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Friday, August 3, 2018 2:11 AM

   Adding to Mike's response, I think terminology varies by region.   I have never heard the name "viaduct" used around here, but then I don't know of any massive stone bridges here in our flat land where no stones exist.

    And I remember reading the term "flyover" years ago, and I was mystified.   I finally figured out they meant "overpass."   Of course, we don't have any spot that I know of where one RR track crosses over another, but in the last couple of years I noticed that on some of the TV traffic reports they have been using the term "flyover" where ramps cross over on highway interchanges.   Must be furriners.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, August 3, 2018 8:46 AM

     In my city, when people talk about the viaduct, they are talking about the main east-west street that goes over the top of a cluster of downtown railroad tracks. 100+ years ago, the city built the viaduct over the tracks because all the railroads came together in one spot and cut the town in half. The street now is actually two 3-lane streets that cross the river and then run 2-3 blocks over the top of the railroad property on concrete piers- no stone arches for us!

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Friday, August 3, 2018 9:01 AM

I think you will find that the difference between "viaduct" and "bridge" is that "viaduct" has 7 letters, whereas "bridge" has only 6.

I looked the two words up in my dictionary and find too much to copy here.  The definition of a Bridge does not mention Viaduct, but Viaduct says it is a bridge that is characterized by being short spans supported on tall/high structures (either of stone/concrete or steel).

I think that us "humans" often blur the definitions of words out of ignorance of their true meanings and thus some "Bridges" are called "Viaducts" by mistake (or snootyness, but when that happens they are often pronounced as 'Vee-a-ducts' instead of 'Vi-a-ducts').

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 228 posts
Posted by RDG467 on Friday, August 3, 2018 9:11 AM

The first viaducts were built by the Romans to carry water across wide valleys to supply Rome.  Since there were no efficient means to lift water uphill, the viaducts maintained the elevation of the hills with a slight grade for gravity-feed purposes.

I believe 'flyover' was a PRR term. Flyovers were built to eliminate crossovers and were especially useful at junctions.  ZOO interlocking on Amtrak in Philly still has flyovers for trains heading NYC to Pittsburgh.  N. Phila would be the only stop in Philadelphia, bypassing the reverse move at Broad Street Station. Trains to Broad street went underneath the Pittsburgh leg of the wye.  

There's another ex-PRR flyover on Amtrak between Claymont & Wilmington, DE, to allow SB freights to access the ex-DuPont Facility on the east side of the tracks without fouling the NB passenger main.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 228 posts
Posted by RDG467 on Friday, August 3, 2018 9:16 AM

 

ChuckCobleigh

Why a duck?  Why a no chicken? 

 

Because-a the water rolls off a duck's back and a-chicken justa gets all wet.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, August 3, 2018 10:49 AM

Breaking the word "viaduct" into it's two roots, "via" means "by way of", while a duct is a way of getting something from here to there.  

Technically, a duct is an enclosed space (by the definitions I saw), but in general what I just wrote kinda fits the bill.

And I agree - a viaduct is a bridge, while a bridge may not necessarily be a viaduct.

In the end, it's whatever people have been calling it for years...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, August 3, 2018 10:59 AM

tree68

Breaking the word "viaduct" into it's two roots, "via" means "by way of", while a duct is a way of getting something from here to there.  

Technically, a duct is an enclosed space (by the definitions I saw), but in general what I just wrote kinda fits the bill.

And I agree - a viaduct is a bridge, while a bridge may not necessarily be a viaduct.

In the end, it's whatever people have been calling it for years...

 

Yes, it is something like the difference between a spanner and a wrench. Or, the difference between a DS and an RTC.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, August 3, 2018 11:22 AM

ChuckCobleigh

Why a duck?  Why a no chicken?

 

Your inner Marx Brother is coming out...

 

As far as terminology goes, in a railroad sense (especially engineering and maintenance)  bridges on railroads includes culverts and pipes carrying natural drainage under (and sometimes over) the railroad along with grade separations.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, August 3, 2018 6:53 PM

MidlandMike
Apparently in local parlance, a viaduct is any RR bridge that crosses over a road.

Just to make matters worse, I used to live in a town that had done a significant grade seperation project, like 80 years prior.

The RR mainlines  through town were raised up on continuous earthen fill, raising the rails approx. 12 feet above their previous "at grade" elevation. Most city streets were bisected by this work.

Some of the major arteries through town were actually excavated down and under the rails, placing the height of the pavement roughly 4 feet lower than it's previous at-grade elevation.

At the point where the rails on the raised fill crossed over these lowered streets, concrete bridges  were built just sufficiently long for the railroad trackes to span over the roadways, giving like a 14 foot  vertical clearance, with a span length of perhaps 50-60 feet.

The locals referred to these portals  where roadways passed through the otherwise continuous raised earthen fill as "viaducts" .

Perhaps because they were "the way through" the track elevation that otherwise divided the city? (matter of perspective)

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, August 3, 2018 9:08 PM

RDG467
The first viaducts were built by the Romans to carry water across wide valleys to supply Rome.  ...

The word is aqueduct.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Friday, August 3, 2018 9:30 PM

Via translates into road or way. The "duct" part comes from aqueduct, which means leading water, which applies to canals and pipes in addition to bridges carrying water. The association with aqueduct and bridges came from the Romans not having any means of piping water under significant pressure, so they put up a bridge to keep the aqueduct near level. Being the most visible part of an aqueduct, the word came to be associated with the bridges as opposed to canals or tunnels.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, August 3, 2018 11:49 PM

mudchicken
ChuckCobleigh

Why a duck?  Why a no chicken?

Your inner Marx Brother is coming out...

As far as terminology goes, in a railroad sense (especially engineering and maintenance)  bridges on railroads includes culverts and pipes carrying natural drainage under (and sometimes over) the railroad along with grade separations.

              Going back to the original source of this question;

    One is reminded of the old story about 'mud-wrasslin with a pig'.Mischief

   In a short time, the individual is reminded that all they are getting is dirtier; while the pig is the only one getting any joy in the exercise. Whistling

 

 


 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, August 4, 2018 1:09 PM

erikem
The "duct" part comes from aqueduct, which means leading water, which applies to canals and pipes in addition to bridges carrying water.

'Duct' comes from 'ducere', meaning 'to lead', the same source as in 'duke' and the title for that name nobody could spell in connection with Cheetos, 'Il Duce' Mussolini.  It also has the connotation 'to draw' (as in ductile metals)

Romans handled inverted siphons (cased in lead, I believe) so there was not a problem with their knowing how to handle pressure; the issue is that aqueducts carry water from significant distances, further than it would be economical to enclose them if their channels can be graded for correct average 'fall' per mile to give the desired throughput in congii or whatever.

This specifically implies that constant-grade accommodation needs to be made over even comparatively small features in the terrain.  For more than relatively small embankments the mass that needs to be excavated and moved for fills begins to add up, and you have all the fun of leaks and settlement with a ready source of liquid ready for even small defects.  So you need something that 'creates' the appropriate continuous flume across the top, but is supported relative to gravity and buildable with a minimum of falsework and scaffolding.  The Roman aqueducts often had multiple levels corresponding to superimposed sets of arches, with only the 'top' level having to be graded for flow.

The association with aqueduct and bridges came from the Romans not having any means of piping water under significant pressure, so they put up a bridge to keep the aqueduct near level. [/quote]

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, August 4, 2018 1:23 PM

CandOforprogress2
Is Viaduct just a fancy term for a bridge?

Perhaps the best explanation might be, if you're going to be passing over it, it's a "bridge", but if you're going to be passing under it, then it's a "viaduct"?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 72 posts
Posted by John Liebson on Tuesday, August 7, 2018 11:34 AM

tree68

Breaking the word "viaduct" into it's two roots, "via" means "by way of", while a duct is a way of getting something from here to there.

Technically, a duct is an enclosed space (by the definitions I saw), but in general what I just wrote kinda fits the bill.

And I agree - a viaduct is a bridge, while a bridge may not necessarily be a viaduct.

In the end, it's whatever people have been calling it for years...

 

 

Etymologically incorrect: "via" in 'visaduct' is Latin for road, not "by way of." Your  "duct" is close enough for this use.

According to the Online Etymological Dictionary, "viaduct" was "apparently coined by English landscape gardener Humphry Repton (1752-1818) for an architectural feature, "a form of bridge adapted to the purposes of passing over, which may unite strength with grace, or use with beauty ...."

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,530 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Tuesday, August 7, 2018 7:51 PM

   Wasn't it Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart who, in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. Ohio wrote, about bridges, I believe, "I know it when I see it"?

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 5:20 PM

John Liebson
According to the Online Etymological Dictionary, "viaduct" was "apparently coined by English landscape gardener Humphry Repton (1752-1818) for an architectural feature,

A "Brit" huh?  Ahh yes,... the British and the Americans, two people separated by a common language.

Distinguishing a banger from a beater, from a banker,  a bender, or a bird, and knowing which one may eat, and which is better left alone.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy