Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
The article points out that railfans are a potential resource in reporting unusual or problem situations. I am surprised, since they quoted Mike Martin, they did not mention that ATSF had a program in the early 90's where they provided railfans with an 800 number to report problems. As for the AAR not be willing to provide the leadership in setting up a mechanism to work with railfans - if true that is precisely a major part of the problem. Although it is impossible to know what the future holds in store for us - the country and railfans - as of now I do not see very few differences compared to pre 9/11. After a prief flurry of incidents in October and November of 2001 things seem to have quieted down. I have photographed on the NE Corridor extensively since 9/11, both on and off the property, and never been bothered. However, I have been reluctant to go down to Washington Union Station to photograph. I have spent a week along the NS and CSX in southern WV and not been bothered. I have photographed along the old RF&P and at Alexandria and not been bothered. Add Sand Patch, the Magnolia Cut-Off and NS's ex Pennsy Line. Let's also remember the railroads continue to host railfan activities from fan trips to railfan days (eg, NS at Altoona). Finally, I wonder whether the two accounts in the article dealt with 2001 or 2002 incidents. In summary, I think the article in Trains was only fair. Also, I think it was premature as there was very little that could be said about the future. Bob Maryland
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag