Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Railroad Capacity
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
L C, Go back to work. [;)] [;)] [}:)] [;)] [;)] <br /> <br />Just joking. [}:)] [;)] [:p] <br /> <br />Maybe some of the abandoned lines will be brought back into service. Some might need a little rehab but if they are still there maybe it is time to use them again. If the Class 1s don't want those lines then let a regional or short line use them. <br /> <br /> <br />I didn't want to start a new thread but I have an observation and sort of a question to ask. It is somewhat related to the capacity issue, and somewhat related to $ $ $. But anyway, has anybody noticed how a railroad doesn't always ship a boxcar (or other car) on the shortest route? Instead of interchanging it to another railroad that has a straighter and faster route they will haul it "round about" "their" system so they can keep all the $ $ $ for hauling it around. Here is an example (and I won't mention any railroad names, because I don't want to play any railroad games [;)] [:D] ). One railroad will bring a car into the northwest corner of a state. There is an interchange point there. However, railroad A will keep the car and not interchange it. Railroad B could accept the car but Railroad A won't give it to them. Railroad B could have the car in the southwest part of the state in 3 or 4 hours. Roadrail A sends the car to the mid cental part of the state where it has a large rail yard. The car must be "classified" , humped, and put into another train. There a new set of power is assigned to the train and a crew called. But the car has traveled an additional 4 or 5 hours, then humped and all, taking another 4, or 6 hours. Then put into a train to leave town. Another 2 hours or so. Then it will travel 4 or 5 hours to get to the southwest part of the state. All in all Railroad A has had the car for 10, or 12 hours (if not longer) trying to keep all the $$$ for hauling that car. Railroad B could have had the car to the southwest part of the state in 3 hours or so whereas Railroad A took many hours longer to get that car there. Now I know this is greately simplified and might even "ruffle" some feathers. But if railroads would cooperate more and develope a more efficient routing system (and not be greedy) then the capacity issue might not be such a big issue at all. If rail service became better and car delivery time decreased then more companies might go back to rail shipments. Well I bet this get some comments now. [;)] <br /> <br />Should I lock myself in the storeroom now or later? [}:)] [;)] <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy