Trains.com

10(+) Things Internet Comment Writers Should Know

7219 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Friday, June 26, 2015 2:18 PM

   And sweet, come to think of it.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oregon
  • 563 posts
Posted by KBCpresident on Saturday, June 27, 2015 12:22 AM

In my case, its because I didn't bother to read far enough up the forum. I only noticed that the gentleman above me was up to 15 1`/2, and without researching further assumed that mine is 16. Not sure about the other guy... Confused

The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad

"Ruby Line Service"

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, June 27, 2015 11:11 AM

Paul of Covington
How come we got three 16's?

 

I think that  the '15 1/2'  confused me Dunce (fixed)

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, June 27, 2015 11:41 AM

I noticed in this months (magazine) issue Q&A section, a reader wrote in asking how a train can turn around using a WYE. And the response given was not "you fool, we already have covered that countless times before, what's the matter, can't figure out  how to use the search function?" Nor did the respondent try to spike the ball with some quip about the reader needing to contact the back issues dept or buy the DVD library.  The magazine answered this seemingly basic question in complete sincerity.

Evidently Kalmbach recognizes that their customer base is comprised of various and sundry levels of knowledge and experience, and is happy to accomodate all levels.

I would suspect that their intent is similar here that their web presence be in support of their published product, and are more than happy for all levels of their customer base to participate here,  when seekingfurther knowledge.

 Similarly I suspect the intent of their web based product is intended more to provide a means of attachment  for their entire customer base than it is for  the personal amusement of a few heavy handed members stroking themselves by making others  feel sorry  that they asked an "elementary" question.

I could be wrong about that....the search function wasn't much help.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, June 27, 2015 12:41 PM

Convicted One

I noticed in this months (magazine) issue Q&A section, a reader wrote in asking how a train can turn around using a WYE. And the response given was not "you fool, we already have covered that countless times before, what's the matter, can't figure out  how to use the search function?" Nor did the respondent try to spike the ball with some quip about the reader needing to contact the back issues dept or buy the DVD library.  The magazine answered this seemingly basic question in complete sincerity.

Evidently Kalmbach recognizes that their customer base is comprised of various and sundry levels of knowledge and experience, and is happy to accomodate all levels.

I would suspect that their intent is similar here that their web presence be in support of their published product, and are more than happy for all levels of their customer base to participate here,  when seekingfurther knowledge.

 Similarly I suspect the intent of their web based product is intended more to provide a means of attachment  for their entire customer base than it is for  the personal amusement of a few heavy handed members stroking themselves by making others  feel sorry  that they asked an "elementary" question.

I could be wrong about that....the search function wasn't much help.

 

You hit the spot! Bow Those of us who have been around for a while have gained knowledge in many ways, and when we come across such a question posed by someone who is new the wonderful world of railroading we should be glad to share the knowledge we have. There are times when I would like to share such knowledge as I have--but realize that someone else has a better understanding than I do and wait for the more knowledgeable person to provide the answer.

Indeed, we are blessed with this means to share our knowledge; when I think of what I first relied on for knowledge--more than sixty years ago: books, encyclopedia articles, conversations with railroad employees, and Trains magazine, I give thanks for the opportunities to learn more, and to share what I know--remembering how narrow my supply of information was then.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 7:37 AM

Technically your point #3 is incorrect...most larger (Class 1) railroads are NOT private corporations but are rather corporations owned by a combination of public citizens (that's folks like you and me) via stock purchases (through various vehicles) and also officers of the corporation (through their own stock ownership either through a private purchase or through stock given them as part of their compensation program/bonus program or other contractural arrangment related to their employment). A "private" company is generally owned outright by an individual or a relatively small group of individuals (such as a family).

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 7:44 AM

eolafan

Technically your point #3 is incorrect...most larger (Class 1) railroads are NOT private corporations but are rather corporations owned by a combination of public citizens (that's folks like you and me) via stock purchases (through various vehicles) and also officers of the corporation (through their own stock ownership either through a private purchase or through stock given them as part of their compensation program/bonus program or other contractural arrangment related to their employment). A "private" company is generally owned outright by an individual or a relatively small group of individuals (such as a family).

In the context of railroads the public/private divide is if the ownership is by governmental entity or nor.  If some form of governmental entity is the owner - it is public.  If not it is private, no mater if it is stock owner held company or a truly private owner held company.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 8:02 PM

Deggesty
You hit the spot!  Those of us who have been around for a while have gained knowledge in many ways, and when we come across such a question posed by someone who is new the wonderful world of railroading we should be glad to share the knowledge we have. There are times when I would like to share such knowledge as I have--but realize that someone else has a better understanding than I do and wait for the more knowledgeable person to provide the answer.

One seeming puzzlement, though, is how a long-dead thread (and I'm talking years, not days or weeks) is suddenly resurrected by someone who has plunged to the depths of old posts, meanwhile another person comes on the forum with a question that was discussed in depth just days ago (more or less).

Oftimes, the OP's question is briefly answered, and he/she is provided a link to a past thread in which such a discussion was held, possibly along with the polite suggestion that they use the search function.  

Of course, given the vagaries of said search function, sometimes that isn't an option...

Any forum has its share of curmudgeons who deign to suffer "newbies."  We're no different.  Then, again, what might seem to the poster to be a polite response may be viewed by others as curt and impolite.  Some days you can't win...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: Flint or Grand Rapids, Mi or Elkhart, It Depends on the day
  • 573 posts
Posted by BOB WITHORN on Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:00 AM

Your posts are a pleasure to read, but more than 60 years? I'm a product of the early 50's, very early, and I figure, except for the high BP, bad back, too much weight, bad knees, bad shoulder, bad ankles, I'm maybe 30'ish. I truely enjoy your civil comments as well as those from all of the above posters.

#20+/-   Keep partison politics out of the discussions. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:22 AM

Thanks, Bob. Christmas of '48 or '49, an uncle gave my youngest brother and me two Modern Wonder books--one about trains and railroading and one about ships, and I began learning about the means of traveling in civilized comfort (my wife's expression, coined before it became a true hassel to travel by air). In 1951, this brother and I took a trip, mostly by rail, to visit another brother, in Baton Rouge, and another uncle, in Chattanooga. This trip sealed my affection for rail travel. The next spring, I discovered Trains magazine, and I have subscribed since. I afflicted the agent in my home town with my presence, and watched the passenger trains in Charlotte as much as I could, talking with some of the employees.

When I got out into the world, I found more friendships with railroad employees, and was able, at times, to play with the real thing (I had no train to play with when I was little). As I have commented before, I would not now even dream of doing what I was able to do more than forty years ago.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, July 3, 2015 11:10 AM

22: There is no grand Warren Buffet/Federal Government conspiracy that causes railroads to avoid maintenence and trains to crash or leads the FRA to skimp on oversight of rail safety. A lot of commenters seem to believe that there is... (See also #4.)

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oregon
  • 563 posts
Posted by KBCpresident on Saturday, July 4, 2015 7:11 AM

NorthWest

22: There is no grand Warren Buffet/Federal Government conspiracy that causes railroads to avoid maintenence and trains to crash or leads the FRA to skimp on oversight of rail safety. A lot of commenters seem to believe that there is... (See also #4.)

 

Does that include the  "Burlington Northern Brought down the Milwaukee Road" conspiracy theory? Big Smile

Happy July 4, by the way 

The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad

"Ruby Line Service"

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy