Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I am not convinced that there is a problem with Rule 112.  Nobody has explained why the push-pull test is unreliable in Canada while it seems to be reliable in the U.S.  But in any case, the problem has been publically identified by TC/TSB and they own it.  Why they went public with it without a solution to the problem is beyond me.  But, what makes it really prickly is the fact that Rule 112 played a central role in the MM&A runaway four years after the TC/TSB announced their knowledge of a defect with the rule that could lead to a runaway.  To my perception, the fact that Mr. Johnston, in his letter to TC/TSB, uses the phrase “may wish to review Rule 112” rather than “must review” is simply an indicator that the ball is in their court.  It is a hot potato of their own making, and it belongs to them.  So there is no point or need to order them to deal with the problem.  In light of the gravity of the matter, Mr. Johnston telling them that they “may wish to review CROR Rule 112” almost sounds like a bit of sarcasm in the form of understating the obvious.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag