Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Mandatory Reciprocal Switching
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="schlimm"]</p> <p>[quote user="Falcon48"]Clear as mud? [/quote]</p> <p>It's the clearest and least agenda-loaded explanation so far on this entire thread. Thanks![/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Agenda-loaded? How do you take the agenda out of the topic? This <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline;">is</span></strong> re-regulation if it comes to past. This is not just railroad operating business about how to switch cars and charge for it. It is in fact a tug of war between two competing agendas. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">It is a tug of war between the railroads and shippers with the shippers enlisting the aid of government regulation. </span><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy