Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Do Railroad Managers Secretly Favor PTC?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Just to add a little clarity to this thread, I came up with a list of possible positions held by the railroad industry in regard to the PTC mandate: </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">1) Railroads oppose the mandate because they cannot meet the deadline.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">2) Railroads oppose the mandate because it is onerous, ham fisted, overly costly, and not the smartest execution of safety improvements. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">3) Railroads oppose the mandate because they have their own technological approach to PTC that they intended to use, but cannot because it is eclipsed by the mandate.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">4) Railroads do not oppose the mandate, but nearly everyone assumes they do.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">5) Railroads oppose the mandate because they are greedy capitalists who could not care less about death and injury, and do not want to waste a dime trying to prevent it. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"></span> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">All of these except for item #4 have been put forth on this forum, and in many other references.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Item #1 is the theme of the FRA response as detailed in their stunning report to Congress. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Items #2 and #3 are widespread viewpoints.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Item #4 is my personal opinion, and I have not heard it offered by anybody in any public venue. It is the topic of this thread where I detailed it in the original post.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Item #5 is also a widespread viewpoint, and I would say that it represents about half of the press coverage on the Internet. It has even been offered here by at least one of the railroaders. In my opinion, it meshes with the worldview that holds that railroads will treat the public unfairly unless the public is protected by heavy government regulation. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy