Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Wake Up and Haul the Bacon
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="schlimm"]</p> <p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]</p> <p>[quote user="Murphy Siding"]</p> <p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]<span style="font-family:verdana, geneva;font-size:small;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Since it is said that the point of the acquisition was to lock in more supply, then it might be that Shuanghui would <span style="color:#ff0000;">sacrifice the higher price of pork in the U.S. market</span> in order to increase supply in the Chinese market. </span></p> <p>[/quote] Did you hear the one about the Chinese company that bought an American pork processor, in order to sell American pork at lower prices in China? Me neither.[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I don’t think you are looking at it deeply enough. Every pork chop Shuanghui sells in the U.S. is one less pork chop they sell in China. It is true that the U.S. chop sells at a higher price. But they bought Smithfield to close the production shortfall in China, and to improve the Shuanghui brand in China, so they might prioritize serving the Chinese market. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And considering that they are currently producing 33 times more pork for China than Smithfield produces for the U.S., Shuanghui might decide that it makes better business sense to sell the Smithfield pork in China (although at a lower price) in order to help improve the supply and brand in China where the bulk of their business will be. In the big picture, they might actually make more money doing that despite sacrificing the higher prices of the smaller U.S. market. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And furthermore, the U.S. pork market is shrinking while the Chinese market is growing, so they might want to favor the Chinese market with brand and supply improvement rather than go after the higher price of the shrinking U.S. market.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And still furthermore, I believe the U.S. Smithfield market will be damaged by the reputation of Shuanghui ownership. If that proves to be the case, then the U.S. Smithfield market will shrink further. If they are trying to improve their brand image in China and in the world, they might be well served by not getting the publicity of butting heads with brand resistance in the U.S. even though they will get a higher price here.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Considering all of those things together, I expect nearly all of the Smithfield pork production to go to China. And I also expect Shuanghui to expand the Smithfield production in the U.S. as much as regulations and environmental capacity can support. I don’t know what the limit of the Smithfield production would be, but I would guess that it will be met before the Chinese pork shortfall is ended.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">So that would be <span style="text-decoration:underline;">all</span> of pork that even a greatly expanded Smithfield can produce going to China by rail and sea, while other U.S. producers take up the slack and fill in the missing U.S. production from Smithfield. </span> </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p></p> <p>That is pure speculation and seems to be largely a rationalization for your distaste for a US corporation being bought by a Chinese one.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-size:small;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">No it is not pure speculation, but I am connecting some dots, and in those areas it is indeed my opinion or speculation. I have read a lot of articles on this acquisition, and most of what I said is presented in those various articles either as a documented fact or as their opinion. They connect dots too. And what is wrong with speculation? Everybody does it. I find the acquisition interesting for its many tentacles of business and marketing principles. I believe it is unprecedented, and I am not sure if anybody completely comprehends all of the implications of the deal.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">If you think that it seems that what I said is largely a rationalization for my distaste for an American company being bought by a Chinese company, then that is your perception, but it is not accurate. And I also have to wonder what you are implying by that comment. Why would I have distaste for an American company being bought by a Chinese company? </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I would prefer not to have jobs go to China, but I don’t blame the Chinese. It is a national policy issue for the U.S. But in any case, the Chinese buying companies in the U.S. is entirely different than U.S. jobs being outsourced to China. The results are entirely different. I could not care less if China bought every business in the U.S. They would still have to use U.S. labor, and follow U.S. regulations. If the Chinese were to invest their wealth in U.S. industry, it would spur expansion and job creation in the U.S. But why would they do that when they can invest for a better return in their own economy? That question is what makes this acquisition so interesting. </span> </p> <p><span style="font-size:small;"> </span> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy