Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Railroad Reregulation ...and Some New Stuff As Well
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="ontheBNSF"]</p> <p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[quote user="Murphy Siding"]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[quote user="Bucyrus"]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[quote user="Murphy Siding"]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I have a hard time believing that any meaningfull railroad re-regulation will ever be implemented. The railroads could make a very simple analogy that most voting Americans could understand. Re-regulation of railroads will add to transportation costs for everything that ships by rail in this country. A limited number of shippers would benefit from re-regulation. Many of those shippers are fairly wealthy and prosperous corporations. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"> Railroad re-regulation is like taxing all of us, and then giving that money to a few wealthy corporations. What Senator or Congressman is going to vote to tax his (or her) constituant's corn flakes, in order to give the money to Exxon-Mobile? [/quote]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I understand your point. But while the railroads argue that regulation will be like a tax flowing to the rich, the regulators will portray new regulations as a tax increase <span style="text-decoration:underline;">on</span> the rich, as in rich railroad corporations, for the purpose of ending railroad monopolies, which will make the voters' corn flakes cheaper.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The regulators want to regulate for their own self interest. So the regulators' rationale will be presented to accomplish regulation, not to defeat it. Therefore, the regulators will side with the shippers, and together, they will defeat the railroads. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[/quote] In my best Foghorn Leghorn voice>> </span><br /><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">"Senator Bucyrus, would you please explain to this here committee , and to the voters back home, why in tarnation you voted to raise the cost of living for every man, woman, and child in these here United States of America, for the sole benefit of some wealthy corporation big-wigs? I say...I say... speak up son, and looky right here into the camera."[/quote]</span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I would say this to your committee:</span></span></p> <p></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">New regulations will not raise costs for the consumers. On the contrary, new regulations will <span style="text-decoration:underline;"><em>lower</em></span> consumer costs by ending a transportation monopoly. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Shippers need transportation choices in order to deliver the goods we all need at the lowest possible cost. A monopoly limits transportation choices, and therefore, it artificially drives up prices higher than they should be. This reform is long overdue. </span> </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p>Competition doesn't necessarily drive down prices. Competition only works when it is a result of market forces. Standard oil and Bell significantly lowered prices despite being monopolies. I have pointed out that Freight Rail competes with other modes. Economies of scale can lower prices.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">ontheBNSF,</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I understand your point, and agree with it, but re-regulation will not be done for objective economics. Instead, economic fairness will largely be just a pretext to regulate. A much larger motive/objective for regulation is that regulation is a power grab by regulators. It builds empires for the regulator community. So regulation is often self-motivated, but it needs an ostensible reason. In this case, monopoly busting is the ostensible reason. And regulation always advances when regulators are in ascendency. Today, we are obviously entering a new season of regulation. And the freight railroads, flush with success, are ripe for regulation.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">However, I do not expect the anticipated new regulations to introduce competition will get much traction in the near future. That kind of regulation requires a sea change in railroad organization and rate structure to bring about some version of open access. It will not come about without the institution of a new National Railroad Transportation Policy (NRTP). These are significant steps along the path to nationalization of the railroads. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Rather than these manly sorts of new regulation, the low hanging fruit of new regulations will be things like the PTC mandate. That would never have happened in the regulation off-season. But the time is now ripe, and I would say look for more of the same. Public safety is a wonderful pretext for the regulator community to advance their interest. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Get ready for the ECP brake mandate. </span></p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy