Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The transition from the "link & pin" to the Janney coupler
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Yes, the loose hardware was a big problem with link and pin couplers in addition to the widely known safety hazard. Another problem was that link and pin couplers generally had a lot more slack than Janney couplers. Unlike Janney couplers, link and pin couplers were not as capable of transmitting a shoving load. So the solution was to equip cars with “deadblocks” on each side of the link and pin coupler. To the best of my knowledge, however, deadblocks were not universal during the link and pin era. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">When shoving, the deadblocks came together and transmitted the compression force, leaving the link and pin coupler somewhat slack. Link and pin couplers were well known to amputate fingers or hands. Deadblocks smashed torsos. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy