Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The transition from the "link & pin" to the Janney coupler
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The slotted knuckle is the basic explanation. However, a point that is often missed in the historical overview is that there was a considerable amount of incompatibility between link and pin couplers. There were many different designs and many required a variety of specialized connecting links and pins in order to mate. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">This led to crews hoarding the loose link and pin hardware so as to have the proper components to mate couplers. A crew setting out twenty cars might strip all of the links and pins, and add them to their stockpile in the caboose. The crew arriving to pick up the cars, would have to go through their stockpile to find all the necessary links and pins to install on the couplers of the twenty cars. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Undoubtedly, this fundamental awkward incompatibility problem continued into the changeover phase to automatic couplers as the well-established working practice of the pure link and pin era. </span> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy