Trains.com

Whatever happened to the Rio Grande?

2176 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Whatever happened to the Rio Grande?
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:37 AM
This is much like the Penn central thread, I know nothing about Rio Grande RR, except I keep seeing pictures- What happened to it, where did it go, how did it go, what did it do, accomplish and how did it go belly up?

Not to bombard anyone, if you only know one question or have info, please share.

Howcome Railpictures.net doens't have any Rio grande Categories for pictures?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:45 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman


Howcome Railpictures.net doens't have any Rio grande Categories for pictures?


They do. It is under the "Fallen Flags (Non-operating)" category as "Denver & Rio Grand Western Railroad"

According to the search there are 213 photos.

Good Luck!
Dennis
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:45 AM
If memory serves, the Denver, Rio Grande, & Western was "gobbled up" by the Southern Pacific, which in turn dissappeared into the Union Pacific.

Looks like the age old question: Who gained what?

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

If memory serves, the Denver, Rio Grande, & Western was "gobbled up" by the Southern Pacific, which in turn dissappeared into the Union Pacific.

Looks like the age old question: Who gained what?


Was the Southern Pacific the one doing the gobbling?

Gabe
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:48 AM
Actually, it was the DRGW that gobbled up the SP. It was Ansultz (sp) and his money that bought the SP.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:01 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevarc

Actually, it was the DRGW that gobbled up the SP. It was Ansultz (sp) and his money that bought the SP.


So that is what SP fans mean when they say "to add Ansultz to injury, they bought us."

Gabe
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:06 AM
And after Anshutz and the Rio Grande bought the SP, then he sold then both to the UP and retained a position the board of directors.
A little side note, the rolling stock leasing co. called Golden West Service is in his wifes name. You think he's got some money?????
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:08 AM
There is a Rio Grande Train operating at Knott's Berry Farm in Buena Park, California. Knott's also owns a Galloping Goose. This is how DRGW became my favorite railroad.

BTW,
Who operates the Rio Grande ski train in Colorado if Rio Grande doesn't?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:11 AM
Here a recent topic to review. Good stuff.

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?page=-1&TOPIC_ID=23086&REPLY_ID=221791#221791
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:42 AM
You might find it interesting to hear that I saw a Rio Grande painted SD40-T2(?) tunnel motor unit on an eastbound UP manifest freight through Kirkwood, MO yesterday (the cab was sub-lettered UP). This units paint was still in remarkably good condition considering the age of the paint job and UP efforts to repaint them.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:51 AM
I still see their rollingstock about. I've seen covered hoppers, gondolas and autoracks.
Andrew
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:14 AM
Why did Anshultz, whose own railroad (DRGW) was doing so well that he could afford to buy the SP, decided to eliminate the DRGW identity in favor of the (failing) SP identity?

I'm sure to perturb the SP fans out there, but I always thought the DRGW units looked so cool, and they seemed to convey an image of power. Granted, in the 'good old days', the SP was much more respected, but when the sale time came, the SP seemed to be a shadow of it's former glory, whereas the DRGW seemed to be very robust.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:37 AM
While I am not sure, their could have been many tax and other fiscal concerns that called for retaining the SP name. It could be much the same type of situation when Chessie was formed. The B&O name was retained for a couple of reasons. 1. Tax exempt status of many B&O properties. If B&O was merged away, these properties would lose their tax exempt status. 2. Deal cut with the City of Baltimore - Again tax and other considerations had to be taken into consideration. The City had very strong feelings about this as the B&O and WM were major shippers through the Port of Baltimore and the City Fathers were very worried that traffic would be move to Newport News on the C&O. Baltimore was at a serious disadvantage to Newport News. It is a lot further to the Atlantic Ocean from Baltimore than from Newport News. That is why B&O was retained.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 27 posts
Posted by jokestre on Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:33 AM
Phillip Anshultz bought the SP then ran into the ground pretty much. Sold SP to UP. DRGW was a gold mine back in the day.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:15 PM
Phil Anschutz did not milk the SP and drive it into the ground. It was a sick line long before Anschutz came on the scene. The problem was single track, loss of market and a myrid of other problems that have been well documented in other categories in this forum.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:18 PM
Probably more accurate to say someting like;

"The SP was in such bad shape that it sucked
the life blood from the D&RGW and neither could survive."
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, October 29, 2004 3:39 AM
Does anyone remember that the last days of the Rio Grande Zephyr had it running only to Grand Junction and not to SLC because of the Thistle mud slide? I rode it and made the connection to a light plane commercial flight at GJ. When Amtrak took over, they had to continue running via the UP for about six weeks, with a protection bus coving the D&RGW Stations, until the new line and tunnel were pushed through.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, October 29, 2004 7:28 AM
A very interesting book with lots of great photos of the Rio Grande Zephyr is
"Never on Wenesday". You might want to get a copy.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Friday, October 29, 2004 9:51 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

Kevarc: I'm not aware of any SP tax exemptions such as you describe for B&O. However, SSW had a low-interest FRA loan for its purchase and rehabilitation of the Cotton Rock, thus SSW actually ended up as the surviving corporation, not Rio Grande and not SP.


I remember water cooler talk that the SP was the surving company to avoid a property tax reassesment of SP land in CA.
Bob
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 29, 2004 1:09 PM
So it didn't go fut, it was justt bought out?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:31 PM
The SP almost never made money after 1960 and perhaps earlier. The railroad, that is. The Corporation owned the railroad, the land grants and the various mineral, timber and ancillory rights, the pipelines, the truck lines and such. It was all of the rest of the stuff that kept the railroad afloat. When the ATSF and the SP planned to merge, everything except the railroad was acquired by the ATSF and when the merger was denied, that left the railroad there to support itself. It couldn't, and that is why Anschutz was able to buy it. Any other railroad could have but was smart enough not to.

Phil Anschutz is no fool. Nor is he slow on the uptake. I don't think he had the idea of becomming the majority stockholder of the UP when he first bought into the DRGW, and then the SP/SSW/SPCSL, but he certainly had it figured out later. The UP wanted the SP so badly that they let himbuy the UP.
Eric
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:44 PM
According to the "Adults Only" thread;it went ^^ up!!!!!!![:D][}:)]

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 31, 2004 3:02 AM
Never on Wednesday is a great book. Also very recommend is Giant's Ladder, the story of the Denver and Salt Lake and of a truly great man and hero for me, David Moffat. Also recommended are Narrow Gauge in the Rockies and Main Line through the Rockies. All are wonderful books with wonderful photographs. I'd put in a plug for Kalmbach at this point but someone might think I am just trying to get my articles published.

Another great book that would delight everyone on this thread is Westing's Apex of the Atlantics, the story of the PRR E-6. Also excellent photographs and line drawings. If modelers want to superdetail an E-6, this is a must book.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 1, 2004 9:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wrwatkins

Phil Anschutz did not milk the SP and drive it into the ground. It was a sick line long before Anschutz came on the scene. The problem was single track, loss of market and a myrid of other problems that have been well documented in other categories in this forum.

Agreed[^]. The story is this.........ATSF + SP = to separate roads in S.California. Then in the early 1980's, ATSF+SP= talks of merger,then in 1985, ATSF+SP=SPSF, make Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation, start painting locomotives in yellow,red,and black.1986 ICC says no. SPSF is to split the SP[V]. DRGW sees an opportunity to buy the SP,and does with Anschutz ,and his vast oil investments and junk bonds from NY banks. then later in years,the UP[V],buys the SP and gets itself in alot of trouble with congested raillines, sidings and the STB. There are 4 books that tell alot about the DRGW and the SP, "Railroad Mergers: Insight and Analysis, by Simmons - Boardman Company, " SPSF 1986-1987 Motive Power Review","SP into the 90's"; and "Southern Pacific Motive Power Pictorial 1987-1988 the Interim years" all three by Joseph W. Shine.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy