Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Are Quiet Zone Crossings Less Safe Than Regular Crossings?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="zugmann"]</p> <p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]<span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;">Union Pacific says quiet zones endanger the public, and the U.P. customers and employees. I wonder how they came to that conclusion. </span>[/quote]</p> <p>They are covering the rears for liability reasons. Of course they are against anything that can be perceived (esp. by lawyers) to be "less safe", even if it isn't actually true.[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;">How does it reduce your liability to publically announce that you are doing something that endangers the public?</span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy