Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Are Quiet Zone Crossings Less Safe Than Regular Crossings?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="zugmann"]Well Mr. Bucyrus, we've heard why you don't believe many ideas would work. So let's get down to business. What do <strong>you</strong> think has to be done to prevent grade crossing collisions? [/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;">One option to enforce crossing law is photo enforcement. I don’t see why that would not prevent all intentional gate and light running. I am sure that the fine for that would be astronomical. A seat belt fine can be over $150. So with the certainty of a fine of say $300-500, I cannot imagine anybody thinking that avoiding the risk of a train delay is worth the money. They would have to set the cameras to allow a 7 second grace period at the onset of activation in order to allow for stopping distance, as I have talked about earlier. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;">A big part of the problem that I see with the status quo is the driver motivation to avoid a train delay. I sense that the industry and safety groups are somewhat defensive about that factor, and thus in denial about it.</span> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy