Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
UP derails coal train on bridge
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The latest news perspective of the U.P. changing the timeline is curious.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The implication is that the company is “changing their story,” which is often held up as a sign of guilt.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Apparently the original “timeline” was that the track was to be inspected twice on 7/4 by the inspectors directly responsible for it. And perhaps the “timeline” would have had one of those inspections already taken place before the train arrived at 1:30 PM.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And perhaps, the track problem had already become apparent by the time of that first inspection, so it would have been properly discovered, and the train notified to stop short of the danger.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Or perhaps both inspections would have occurred after 1:30 PM, so it would not have prevented the disaster.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">But so what?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Whatever the original “timeline” was, what is the significance of it being changed? It is beside the point.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Regardless of when inspections were scheduled, the 600-pound gorilla in the room is the fact that U.P. did discover the dangerous problem hours before the train arrived.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And this discovery allowed more than enough time for U.P. to take action on the problem and prevent the train disaster that occurred at 1:30 PM.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, U.P. failed to act on the problem and prevent the disaster, so the disaster did occur at 1:30 PM. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">And what makes this all the more ironic is that the company was aware of the abnormally hot weather, and its associated risk of sun kinks, and their ability to derail trains.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And in response to this peril, the company had placed people on alert to make an extra effort to detect possible development of sun kinks before they could cause a disaster.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And yet when a sun kink was actually discovered and reported, no action was taken. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The U.P. spokesman glosses over this negligence by telling us that the signal maintainer did exactly what he was supposed to do, as if that were the issue.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And apparently, the newspaper does not even see the 600-pound gorilla.</span></span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span> </span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy