Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Debunking 106.1 mph (April Trains)
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">It is interesting that Mr. Hankey flatly asserts that the speed record would have been <span style="text-decoration: underline;">physically impossible</span>, with his only verification being that it is the “opinion” of Bill Withuhn.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Mr. Hankey has vaguely implied that the firebox size on the AT&SF engine was not large enough to achieve the claimed speed record.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And apparently, the assessment of the firebox inadequacy is based on the fact that this was a relatively small firebox compared to more modern locomotives.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But just because more modern locomotives had bigger fireboxes, it does not necessarily follow that they were capable of higher speeds.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Locomotive development was not an evolution toward higher and higher speeds, as this firebox size issue tries to assert.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Instead, the development evolution was toward the ability to pull ever-greater train weights at typical road speed limits.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">So the size of the AT&SF engine’s firebox relative to later fireboxes is irrelevant to the speed record claim.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Compared to later engines, the AT&SF engine did have a smaller firebox, but it was also a lighter locomotive, and train weight was relatively lighter.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We are talking about a train weight of 170 tons.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is only a little more the just one of today’s loaded cover hoppers.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">As has been suggested, the proper analysis of this speed record claim is the relationship between horsepower and total train weight, including the weight of the locomotive.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The main challenge is to determine the horsepower.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Generally, I do not see much analysis of horsepower for steam locomotives.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Diesels produce their maximum horsepower when the throttle is wide open under maximum loading.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Steamers develop more horsepower the faster they go, up to the point where they can’t burn fuel any faster. I do recall some intense discussions here on the forum about horsepower versus tractive effort.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The beauty of it was that you could always tell when the correct mathematical conclusions were reached because everybody was in perfect agreement. </span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy