Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Is Amtrak Crash Nevada’s Fault?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I don’t intend to suggest that this faulty statement on the U.P. website has anything to do with excusing the truck driver in the Nevada crash.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The U.P. website issue is only obliquely related to the Nevada crash by the fact that both involve grade crossings.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I stumbled across the website in researching the Nevada crash.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I also happened to find a very interesting study by the state of North Carolina concerning the discovery of patterns of driver misunderstanding of the law and what leads to that misunderstanding.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That NC study is actually closely related to the faulty statement on the U.P. website. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The NC study finds that crossings pose many variables that accustom drivers to deal directly with those variables rather than consulting their copy of the crossing law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The study finds that many drivers are following their own belief system without realizing that it is contrary to the law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The study explores the crossing contingencies that lead to such beliefs.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The centerpiece of this errant belief system is the drivers’ assumption that the crossing protection system is merely advisory rather than regulatory as the law says.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Based on the discovery of this misinterpretation, groups such as Operation Lifesaver and railroad companies such as the U.P. are focusing effort on dispelling this driver misconception about the signals being advisory.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I realize that the U.P. website does not have the force of law, but the U.P. dedicates part of their website to this effort to educate drivers.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So it hardly seems irrelevant that their website makes a statement that conveys information that directly conflicts with their effort to inform drivers about the meaning of the crossing protection system. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I agree that the website will not reach many people, but U.P.’s point of it is to reach as many people as they can.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So, I would think they would not want to accidentally say something on the site that conflicts with their basic purpose in having the site.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy