Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Is Amtrak Crash Nevada’s Fault?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="tdmidget"]</p> <p>... then you must be prepared to stop and <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-size: xx-large;">if</span> </span>that means slowing down, then you must do so. </p> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">(My emphasis added to quote by TDM)</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">If a crossing has limited visibility down the tracks, and is not signalized, then being prepared to stop might require slowing down. However those conditions do not apply to the Nevada crash crossing. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">There is no need to slow down there in order to be prepared to stop. Assuming that a driver is not distracted, there is ample time for a 70 mph vehicle to stop within that final 900 ft. straight approach if a train is approaching, no matter whether the signals are working or not. So there is not a need to slow down in anticipation of the need to stop. </span></span></p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy