Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Is Amtrak Crash Nevada’s Fault?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="tree68"]</p> <p> <blockquote> <div><img src="/TRCCS/Themes/trc/images/icon-quote.gif" /> <strong>Bucyrus:</strong></div> <div></div> <p> <blockquote><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;mso-fareast-font-family:'Times New Roman';mso-ansi-language:EN;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size:small;">Well perhaps so, but it is a prediction that is impossible to verify.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span>And in that same vein, I predict that if the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Active Advance Warning</span> system had been applied to the crossing, the crash would have never happened.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span></span></span></span></blockquote> </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p> </p> </blockquote> </p> <p><span style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="color:#003300;">Unless it somehow slaps the driver up alongside the head and shouts, "pay attention," no system is going to prevent an accident from happening if the driver is distracted, is not properly focussed on the road ahead, or is trying to beat the train.</span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="color:#003300;">Thus we'll always see this kind of suit - the insistance that if government had done <i>one more thing</i> the incident wouldn not have happened...</span></span></span></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span lang="EN" style="font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">There are many instances of the traffic control authorities adding more warning beyond the minimum, to a hazard just to increase the probability of attracting a driver’s attention.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They don’t draw a line in the sand.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is absurd to believe that only so much warning is necessary and no additional warning will make any difference. With that reasoning, if all we had were non-signalized crossings, and someone suggested adding lights and gates, would you insist that adding lights and gates would not reduce crashes? </span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy