Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Is Amtrak Crash Nevada’s Fault?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="garr"]</p> <p> <blockquote> <p>If this truck was in fact the first in a convoy, which implies closely following trucks, the protection proved adequate enough for the following two. </p> <p>Jay</p> </blockquote> </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Yes, but just because some drivers can avoid a collision without an extension of the crossing warning, that does not necessaily mean that the extended warning is not needed. If that were the case, we would not need signals and gates at grade crossings. Assuming good sight distance, a simple crossbuck should suffice.</span></span></p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy