Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Fatal Rear-end Collision Reported on BNSF
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="mudchicken"]</p> <p>Bucky Russ:</p> <p>That area out there is double main track CTC with speeds for freight trains nominally anywhere between 30 and sixty MPH dependent on geometry. </p> <p>McPherson is the end of double track, east of Ellison. McPherson to Red Oak is single main track because of the Nishnabota River bridge. Photos don't tell you much right now.</p> <p>PTC has yet to prove itself, has no long term track record and is still a work in progress. (IMHO)</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">My concern is not about the potential effect of PTC.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I was just wondering; between the two trains, whose responsibility was it to avoid the collision?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Would it be correct to assume that the coal train should have had a stop signal in advance of the work train? Or do we just not know the details of the two train movements at this time? </span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy