QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan The only decent 4 axle GE units are the P-42 which is designed for passenger service. GE sells nothing else from what I have seen on GE's website. I would imagine that the P-42 would be excellent roadrailer power. Andrew - As usual, you are WAY off base. ..... You might want to try some reading again, before blundering into a new area... LC
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan The only decent 4 axle GE units are the P-42 which is designed for passenger service. GE sells nothing else from what I have seen on GE's website. I would imagine that the P-42 would be excellent roadrailer power.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Overmod Mook sez quote Will they ever go to something bigger than the 6 axel? Or have they reached their limit in length and axels? /quote DD40s worked fine on UP, probably wouldn't cut it on most other railroads with that long rigid truck wheelbase. Steerable trucks work best with a 'center' axle, which a D truck doesn't have; swingout on longer trucks (i.e. "E") would be mechanically uneconomic... we won't go into what would be needed for proper bolstering and weight transfer on such a thing. Future of anything larger than C-C units would, of course, involve span bolstering of 'conventional' truck sizes -- B-B for four axles (as on the more successful version of double-engined GEs around the time of the DD35s and DD40s) and C-C as on the Norfolk and Western turbine 2300. Allows full interchangeability of parts, underframes, etc. with regular locomotives. Why bother with anything else? Centipede underframes were demonstrated to be less effective than separate trucks a half-century ago. Interestingly enough, America hasn't embraced a B-B-B configuration under a single carbody (instead of C-C) even though units both here and abroad have been tried.
Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.