Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why not FAF instead of HSR?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Paul_D_North_Jr"]</p> <p>Based on that concept, you could make a good mathematical case that trains leaving every 2 hours or even 4 -5 hours at 79 MPH is functionally much faster for intermediate distances - like 400 miles or so - end-to-end, than a once or twice a day scenario at a much higher speed. </p> <p>- Paul North.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">So if you want to take the train to Omaha, and the trip takes two hours, but it will be ten hours before the train leaves, then that is a twelve-hour trip?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Is that how frequent is faster?</span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy