Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
What have NIMBY's done in yout town?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="ICLand"] <P>[quote user="Bucyrus"]</P> <P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'"><FONT face=verdana,geneva><FONT size=2>But it does not follow that a 300-ton train uses 1143 times the energy to travel 300 mph as a 1.5-ton car uses to travel 10 mph.<SPAN> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN>[/quote] </P> <P>You can't. I tried to say that; it is only a very broad analogy. These are indexed and each is indexed to its own weight and inherent fuel consumption. By and large, indexes cannot be compared to each other except in very broad terms; in this case the efficiency of energy use as the vehicle changes with speed. Both vehicles have relatively good efficiency at low speeds, and both are just awful at high speeds. That's a feature of speed, not the vehicle type. A car can't go very fast, so it retains a degree of relative efficiency. A HSR vehicle, to the extent that it is highly energy inefficient at the speeds it is designed to go, gains economic efficiency if it can obtain a ridership sufficient to overcome the inherent energy efficiency of slower speed modes. This is all compounded by cycle times because the car's slower speed adds a cycle time efficiency to the HSR's advantages. </P> <P>But, you are exactly right, these are not measures of energy use; they are measures of the efficiency of energy use. Energy use is different for each vehicle type, and so the use x the efficiency would be getting closer to what you are looking for.<BR></P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">As you say, you need to factor actual energy used per mile in a train versus in a car on the highway.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Without that information, there simply is no basis to determine, over a given distance, how many passengers an HSR train would need to carry in order to equal the efficiency of that same number of people using their individual cars on the highway. I don’t see how it even offers a broad analogy.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> The</SPAN> only thing that the table illustrates is the rapid increase in energy needed for increasing speed.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But it offers no way to compare HSR to automobiles.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></SPAN></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy