Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The economics of Positive Train Control
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="edblysard"]The FRA doesn't make laws...<SPAN></SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN> <P>They do make policy recommendations and legal suggestions.</P></SPAN> <P>They are charged with enforcing the laws and each railroads own rules.</P> <P>The Legislature makes the laws, and once it becomes law, the FRA has to enforce it, no matter if it makes sense or not.</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Ed,</FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>I understand your point about the distinction of the role of the lawmakers as opposed to the role of the FRA, but are they not sort or joined at the hip?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>You have the public sector FRA, which wants to grow larger, teemed up with the public sector lawmakers who can impose mandates on private industry.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Those mandates will grow the FRA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>For example, how much larger will the FRA become if it is to administer the implementation and regulation of PTC?</FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Although the FRA cannot mandate anything until it is made into law, doesn’t the FRA have a hand in promoting an idea to be made into law?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They spend money developing safety measures such as PTC, ECP brakes, remote coupling and uncoupling, and freight car side reflectors before any laws are made that require these safety improvements. Surely this development of safety ideas must boost the chances of getting congress to make laws that require them.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Will the government soon mandate that all couplers be Type-F ?</FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Aside from the influence of the FRA, does the legislature get stampeded into mandating these safety improvements by the private special interests that will benefit financially from a massive program such as the implementation of PTC?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It seems as if the improvement of safety is a sort of "magic bullet" that can overcome any opposition from the ones who have to pay for it, and thus work to the benefit of those who will profit off of producing the improvement.</FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Today PTC is one obvious example of this.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But there are other items in the pipeline such as ECP brakes, and remote coupling and uncoupling.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>These ideas are not new.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They have been around a long time.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>As public pressure for safety was applied over time, the industry adapted safety measures according to their cost/benefit.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva size=2></FONT></SPAN> </P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva><FONT size=2>However, it seems that what has changed today is that the public pressure component has become very sophisticated and is now capable of taking away the railroad companies’ prerogative on what improvements are worth the cost and which are not.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy