Trains.com

Big mess on I-57... July 12 News Wire

842 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Big mess on I-57... July 12 News Wire
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 2:32 PM
Today's TRAINS News Wire includes a photo of the UP/CN coal train derailment off an overpass and onto I-57 in Illinois. Luckily, no one was killed.

Click here to read today's News Wire.

Bergie
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:03 PM
Lucky is right, this is an extrememly busy piece of highway.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:30 PM
It's like a wise man once said..Things happen in threes...Here in alexandria,la. there was derailment involving train LIFW and it derailed right near downtown Alexandria. Two engines and I say about nine or ten cars derailed,but there was no tieups on the mainline. Just a lot of damn headaches for dispatchers in Omaha.Then there was the derailment of the CITY OF NEW ORLEANS in Mississippi. Now along comes the I57 derailment. Boys...something has got to be done about the condition of the rails.Its gonna take one major derailment where a crew gets injured or even worsed killed.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:01 PM
Thanks Bergie for the picture.

What a relief that someone wasn't hurt bad or killed!

With the coal cars stacked up like that, maybe it was going at a fair speed?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,794 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:08 PM
30-45 mph probably....CN/IC like most other North American railroads restrict the speeds on coal trains to 45 MPH or less for loads. LC, CSX or some of the others can tell you how much fun (tons and tons worth) it is to keep that momentum under control.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:37 PM
Good luck for a change...

LC
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

30-45 mph probably....CN/IC like most other North American railroads restrict the speeds on coal trains to 45 MPH or less for loads. LC, CSX or some of the others can tell you how much fun (tons and tons worth) it is to keep that momentum under control.


Ahhh mudchicken! [:)] That's it! [;)] Momentum is a powerful force. [:0] Being fully loaded, the momentum can cause such spectacular stacks withou needing to go at high sped. Mind you, with all that coal, [:0] 45 mph is fast enough....[:0]

Dave
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:06 PM
One second you see the train on the overpass.. the next second the train is on your hood.

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:52 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

30-45 mph probably....CN/IC like most other North American railroads restrict the speeds on coal trains to 45 MPH or less for loads. LC, CSX or some of the others can tell you how much fun (tons and tons worth) it is to keep that momentum under control.


An article I read this morning suggested that the speed on that particular line was 25 m.p.h. It doesn't sound fast, but that speed was definitely capable of producing a wreck like that.

I wonder if the wreck-damage potential increases proportionally to the square of the speed increase (we were taught that maxim about coupling speeds). If so, the disaster would have been twice as bad at 35 m.p.h, four times as bad at 50 (UP's own speed limit for coal trains).

The article I read said that the track is open now, but trains are moving at 10 m.p.h. across the bridge until all repairs are completed.
http://www.utu.org/worksite/detail_news.cfm?ArticleID=15217

For what it's worth, I suspect a track defect. Don't know if the cause has been determined, though. Just a gut feeling I have...same one I had when the City of New Orleans derailed a while back, strengthened by the mud-holes I saw along IC's main line parallel to I-57 a couple of days ago.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:19 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Kozzie

Thanks Bergie for the picture.

What a relief that someone wasn't hurt bad or killed!

With the coal cars stacked up like that, maybe it was going at a fair speed?



I would assume they were using a DPU on the end of the train, and when the cars derailed, the locomotive in the rear kept shoving for a while.
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:17 PM
I see that bridge often and I posted a thread minutes after it happened.

Pump

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:19 PM
And the train was going fairly slowly, maybe 15 when this happened.

Pump

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:47 PM
It doesn't take much speed to do that. The DPU certainly makes sense.

LC
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:45 PM
Complete sense. At first I thought with the tucks still in the area of the track that it might have been some sort of a bolser failure or something, but I'm no expert.

Noah
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:23 PM
When UPTRAIN opened this topic, I asked what church the truck driver attended. 1200 cars an hour means 20 cars a minute, and given how traffic can bunch up... More than a few folks may have been wiping their brows.

I have been at that spot countless times. I believe the line was originally built to reach coal mines, and after construction of the Edgwood Cut-off became a means of getting betwee the cut-off to the east and the Carbondale Line to the west. Old Ben Mine 26' (now closed) lead ran north from the bridge on the west side of I-57, so in those days cars would often be on the bridge. Being before the extensive use Wyoming coal, I don't think their was much other traffic accross that line.

That is now a logical route for Wyoming coal going to Barge Terminals located just above the damn that holds back Kentucky Lake. Was wondering how well that track has been maintained or up graded. Kind of rough when I was there in the mid 80's, but with no DP on the 100 car trains, top speeds might have been in the range of 10-15 MPH.

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy