Trains.com

BNSF Wyoming Derailment - River Photo Heavy

5989 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
BNSF Wyoming Derailment - River Photo Heavy
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Thursday, May 13, 2010 3:40 PM

Derailment into a river -- What a ride this train crew had!

http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_e47af926-1021-5412-9d9c-c1560008fd03.html

There are plenty of news photos on the link result's lower left.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 13, 2010 3:51 PM

"The train's two-man crew was able to escape and swim to safety" Shock  As if simply running off the tracks wasn't spooky enough.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:37 PM

[EDIT - Fixed formatting - 10:05 AM Fri. 14 May 2010 - PDN]

"Honey, I'm home. You won't believe what happened to me at work today . . . And you won't even have to wash my clothes (or my underwear)".

It's about 34 photos total, and some of them are really good.

What's different is that the radiator/ dynamic brakes portion of the rear end of the trailing unit broke off and tumbled down the embankment, landing against the underside of a covered hopper.

The lead unit in Warbonnet paint is clearly leaking black diesel fuel, and a blood-red fluid - probably coolant, or lube oil ?

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:34 PM

Paul_D_North_Jr
"Honey, I'm home. You won't believe what happened to me at work today . . . And you won't even have to wash my clothes (or my underwear)". It's about 34 photos total, and some of them are really good. What's different is that the radiator/ dynamic brakes portion of the rear end of the trailing unit broke off and tumbled down the embankment, landing against the underside of a covered hopper. The lead unit in Warbonnet paint is clearly leaking black diesel fuel, and a blood-red fluid - probably coolant, or lube oil ? - Paul North.

Paul: You beat me to the questions I was going to ask.

1. Is the red fluid coolant (maybe glycol?)

2. Why did the dynamic brakes radiator metal work become detached?. Am wondering if the first covered hopper car (grain?) went up and over the anti-climbers and sheared the section off ? Any diesel mechanic know if the broken off section is at a joining/construction mating point?

3. How did someone who came upon the wreck get such good photos?

4. What happened to the  "rock"?

 

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:20 PM

I thought they dyed off road diesel fuel red.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:50 PM

blue streak 1

1. Is the red fluid coolant (maybe glycol?)

I'd put my money on the red fluid being diesel, and the black fluid being lube oil.

2. Why did the dynamic brakes radiator metal work become detached?. Am wondering if the first covered hopper car (grain?) went up and over the anti-climbers and sheared the section off ? Any diesel mechanic know if the broken off section is at a joining/construction mating point?

Easy to go over the anticlimber when the unit is on its side.  I would expect that the car nose down into the river is the guilty party.

3. How did someone who came upon the wreck get such good photos?

Probably the highway patrolman who saw the wreck happen.  Patrol cars usually carry cameras to aid in collecting evidence.

4. What happened to the  "rock"?

GOOD question.  I'd like to see a photo taken from the side where the lead unit hit it.

Chuck

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Friday, May 14, 2010 7:02 AM

All Off Road Diesel Fuel is DYED red so the Goverment knows if your trying to avoid paying any Fuel taxes on it.  So that would be the Red Fluid leak.  Black fluid from a Diesel motor is LUBE oil plain and simple.  100 miles after getting my oil changed in my OTR trucks it would be black already from soot.  ON GE Locomotives they are buil in Modules were all the wires fans and such are placed on the frame then bolted on.  So that wouild be why the Radiator and DB section came off.  You get hit by 286K of DEAD weight and see if you stay put.  The Boulder from the pics looks like it was on the Right side of the locomotive and lifted up the front of the lead unit.  Once it derailed forget about it all over.  That crew was very lucky

Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, May 14, 2010 8:20 AM

One thing I noticed when looking at the picture of the derailment site was that there were no 'telltale' (not sure of the right term) poles/wires like I've seen in other mountainous areas.  Perhaps that may have warned the crew if those were in place?  I guess that depends on where the last signal was though.

Wonder if they'll scrap the locos or fix 'em. 

Dan

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, May 14, 2010 9:21 AM

By the appearance of the wreck site, it's not going to be any help to get the necessary equipment on site to extract the locomotive, etc.....up out of the water and up the enbankment.  The space at the ROW seems pretty tight there.

Sure will require power of what ever equipment to drag that 200 tons back up to where it must be placed for recovery.

I'm assuming that track there is single....At least, that's what it looks like to me.  Of course I'm just a fan looking at it and what seems to stand out to me....

I wondered about safety catch fence there too...Doesn't seem to be any, and if it happens seasonably, why not....?

Quentin

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Friday, May 14, 2010 11:12 AM

Thanks for the answers/ corrections, esp. as to the fluid colors from edbenton.  The only thing that makes me feel good about asking/ stating sometimes dumb things is that I usually learn a whole lot more/ better then !   Smile,Wink, & Grin

This photo linked below shows that there's a highway - which was alluded to in the article - and maybe even a 'scenic view' pull-off or turn-off on the other side of the canyon.  If so, it would sure be a good place to watch and photograph the re-railing and clean-up activities from: 

http://trib.com/collection_5e93cd00-5e9c-11df-aa84-001cc4c002e0.html?photo=15 

I'm not sure, but perhaps 'the rock' is the one that's about midway along the top of the overturned 2nd 'pumpkin' unit ?  There's another really big rock about 100 ft. ahead of the lead 'Warbonnet' unit, which shows that rockfalls do happen from time to time here.

What several of you are thinking of is a 'slide detector fence' - which has from several to many wires in a verticla plane running parallel to the track, or its close cousin, a 'rockfall detector fence' - which may also have wires over top of the track to detect rocks that may fall more vertically.  After this incident, BNSF may rethink installing one - or may be more aggressive about hi-rail patrols in advance. 

Although, I believe the article stated that there was a hi-rail patrol here - the rock must have come done right after it passed, and before the train got there.  That kind of unfortunate timing might be hard to prevent - sometimes the rocks even come down as the train is going by and get wedged under the cars and then derail them.  In such instances the detector fence and hi-rail patrols won't do a thing to prevent that - maybe the better remedy is to install a wall at the bottom, or a screen to hold the rock in place, or to 'scale' the cliff to remove loose rocks, or 'shot-crete' or rock-bolt them in place, etc. 

The real problem here is that this line sees only a couple trains a day - which doesn't justify a huge expense to prevent or mitigate the risk or threat of rockfalls, and also means that the risk doesn't have a lot of opportunites to cause this kind of havoc.  Except, of course, for when it does, as here . . . Sigh

- Paul North.  

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, May 14, 2010 11:25 AM

Good points on the "Catch-22" Paul, and thanks for the correct names for what I and Quentin had in mind.

Dan

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • 54 posts
Posted by BNSF@NARS on Friday, May 14, 2010 4:43 PM

WOW!

I Am Glad The Train Crew Was Unharmed, But Holy Cow! That Is A Miracle They Survived, Out Of All Derailment Photos That Looks Like The Worst! With The Locomotives And Cars Falling Down The Hill, Hitting A Rock At 30MPH Cars Scattered All Over The Place, A Loco In The Water, And More And More, CRAZY!

B-Daddy
  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Hillsboro, Oregon
  • 934 posts
Posted by Eric97123 on Friday, May 14, 2010 5:34 PM

That will buff right out! Laugh

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Rock Springs Wy.
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by miniwyo on Friday, May 14, 2010 6:57 PM

 That crew was sure lucky that the river is lower than it usually is this time if year. That part of the river runs high and fast in the spring with lots of big rocks to bounce against if you are in the water. BNSF patrols the canyon in a Hi Rail about 15 minutes before and after a train passes, so it had it have just fallen. I still don't know why they haven't put in slide fences in spots prone to those things. The Wind River Canyon is such an amazing place, It is kind of a shame to see this happen there.

 Here is a video story for the Casper Star Tribune

http://trib.com/news/vmix_bf13dec4-5e4a-11df-bc69-001cc4c002e0.html

RJ

"Something hidden, Go and find it. Go and look behind the ranges, Something lost behind the ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go." The Explorers - Rudyard Kipling

http://sweetwater-photography.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, May 14, 2010 9:05 PM

Looking at the pictures...especially the 1st one.  It looks like 'the rock' came from about 20 feet above the covered hopper that is leaning at 45 degrees.....it would appear that the bigger part of the rock was knocked into the water at the point where the grain is spilled down the embankment, the smaller part of the rock that is visible on the fireman's side of the right of way just ahead of the derail engines was probably launched there in the initial impact.  I find it somewhat amazing the the rear portion of the 2nd units car-body was sheared off the frame....of course several thousand tons with the kinetic energy of 30 MPH of motion can do some damage when brought to a sudden stop.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Saturday, May 15, 2010 10:06 PM
"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy