Trains.com

Big, fat, empty

4023 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Big, fat, empty
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:02 PM

     Today I ran accross a group of heavy-duty, 8 axle flatcars sitting in a siding.  All were like QTTX 131286.  Loading info showed a load limit of 468,900 (!).  Through the wonder of the internet,  I can find photos of that particular car sitting in various rail yards.  The photos always seem to show it sitting empty.  What would heavy-duty flatcars be hauling out in corn & soybean country?  Would they be greatly restricted. as to where they could operate, based on the loaded weight?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 2:45 PM
Hard to tell what it would be hauling. It was intended for large, heavy loads of stuff like steel plate. An ordinary steel-deck flat car, no tiedowns for heavy equipment or the like, no depressed center for tall loads.

A check of the car's dimensions and capacity reveal that it has a gross rail load of 630,000 pounds. It makes little difference whether it's 630,000 pounds on eight axles or 315,000 pounds on four. But the railroad lines in the country that can handle gross rail loads of 315,000 pounds are pretty few and far between. An obvious possibility in "corn and soybean country" would be the UP's ex-C&NW main line across Iowa--but even that is restricted to the 286K gross rail load (I think UP did that--CNW used to rate it at 315K).

So where did you see it? I don't know whether BNSF's main line is good for 315K, but that's probably the only line that's likely to be. If these cars brought a load up into some remote location, they obviously couldn't be loaded to their limit without some sort of special clearance.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Hillsboro, Oregon
  • 934 posts
Posted by Eric97123 on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 3:04 PM

Here is a link to a pick of one loaded that used to used by Boeing   http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?2,1481727  

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 3:05 PM

Transformers and/ or generators for coal-fired power plants.

More likely these days, nacelles/ generators for the giant wind turbines.

 Here's a link to a photo - not mine - of sister QTTX 131276 with the hulk of a wrecked loco on board -

 http://www.railcarphotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=12980 

469,000 lbs. 'Load Limit' over 8 axles = 58,600 lbs. per axle, plus the weight of the car itself - probably on the order of 80,000 lbs. or so, so maybe 70,000 lbs. gross weight on each axle.  That's heavy but not outrageous - a 'standard' 263,000 lb. car is 65,800 lbs. per axle, whereas the 286K cars - as in covered grain hoppers and coal gons, etc. - are 71,500 lbs. per axle. 

Really, each end of this car with its pair of trucks is not much worse than the adjoining trucks of a coupled pair of such hopper cars.  So, as long as the next car isn't too heavy - probably it's an idler or spacer empty anyway - it's no worse than allowing such cars on a particular line. 

This illustrates the need to differentiate the load applied at each level in the track structures, bridges, and soils.  For track in reasonably good condition - even with 100 lb. rail and a fair number of marginal ties, at low speeds - the individual axle loads here will not likely overload the rails at any one point.  But the further down in the track structure you go, the more the higher loads overlap and become additive - though again, not worse than the hopper cars.  Or, if the rail was lighter and/ or the ties conditions poor and/ or the ballast wet and muddy and/ or the subgrade weak - then so many loaded axles close together might be more of a concern.

However, a series of these cars as you saw, each fully loaded and coupled to each other without a spacer or idler car between, will be imposing 8 axles' worth of 70,000 lb. loads over the short distance at the adjoining car ends, whereas the normal loading for the track would only be 4 such axles.  So while the load on the rails and ties immediately under each axle would not be much different than for a regular car, nor for about 10 to 15 feet down into the subgrade, the load on a bridge that's long enough to have all 4 trucks = the 2 end trucks of each of 2 coupled cars on it at the same time - is also going to be about doubled.  As a result, bridges that are about 30 feet and longer - and members within any bridge that are longer than about 15 ft. or so - would need to be checked carefully, up to around 100 ft. or so.  

With those longer spans, their designs are governed more by the average gross weight per foot of train than the possible combinations of short and heavy axle loads.  A 70,000 lb. axle load is commensurate with a 7,000 lb. per ft. average gross load for a Cooper's E-70 loading, which would be about 420,000 lbs. gross for a 60 ft. long car.  These cars are heavier than that - 459,000 lbs. payload plus 80,000 lbs. my estimate for car weight = 540,000 lbs., so this might be problematical unless spacer cars are used for that reaon as well.  Even an E-80 loading would be challenged by these cars - at 60 ft., that would still be only 480,000 lbs. allowable.

On the other hand, mayber the loads on these cars are just a little more than the usual flatcar's 100 tons = 200,000 lbs. or so, but not near or fully utilizing the 459,000 lb. max. of these cars - in which case, the many axles are already being used to spread out the load and lower the 'per axle' load, even if not the total gross load.  Depending on where in that range the load actually is would determine the actual axle loading and gross car weight, and whether spacer/ idler cars are needed to spread those loads out to be acceptable for the rail, the rest of the track structure, and any bridges, etc. 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 3:34 PM
Paul, the light weight of the car that Norris mentioned is 161,100 pounds, giving the car a gross rail load of 630,000 pounds, the figure I alluded to. The car in your photograph weighs 100 pounds less, and consequently has a load limit of 100 pounds more, giving it the same gross rail load. That might change a few of the figures in your thoughtful post.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:18 PM

man so why  did this post  originally not show up until after I made the second post to replace it? (edit)

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:23 PM

CShaveRR
A check of the car's dimensions and capacity reveal that it has a gross rail load of 630,000 pounds. It makes little difference whether it's 630,000 pounds on eight axles or 315,000 pounds on four. But the railroad lines in the country that can handle gross rail loads of 315,000 pounds are pretty few and far between. .

Just because the car has a max rating of 630,000 lbs, is no guarantee that is the intended loading, is it?

Wouldn't 286,000 lbs spread over 8 axles be less stressful to the road bed than 286,000  lbs spread over 4? Especially some spongy "mud pumped" spur.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:38 PM

Linked here is a post from the past:

http://cs.trains.com/trccs/forums/t/67417.aspx?PageIndex=2

Pictured here are some of those QTTX Flat cars with the little QJ Chinese Steam engines loaded!Wow!!

The pictures were made for us( Trains Forum) by Mr. Ed Blysard of Houston ,Tx.Thumbs UpThumbs Up

If you chedck the above link, you'll find the coments on that thread which Ed made the photos and shared with all of us.  Rhought that you might like to see these, again. 'Murphy S.'  They also wound up in "Corn Country" as well in Iowa.   Enjoy!

 

 


 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:34 PM
Convicted One

CShaveRR
A check of the car's dimensions and capacity reveal that it has a gross rail load of 630,000 pounds. It makes little difference whether it's 630,000 pounds on eight axles or 315,000 pounds on four. But the railroad lines in the country that can handle gross rail loads of 315,000 pounds are pretty few and far between. .

Just because the car has a max rating of 630,000 lbs, is no guarantee that is the intended loading, is it?

Wouldn't 286,000 lbs spread over 8 axles be less stressful to the road bed than 286,000  lbs spread over 4? Especially some spongy "mud pumped" spur.

That's true enough. The point is that the load has to be watched, and the load limit in many cases is not dependent on the GRL rating of the car's trucks.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:31 AM

Carl,

Is it possible to have a flat car capable of hauling the same load but with a depressed center for tall loads, with roughly the same car weight, or are depressed center cars usually heavier?

Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:24 AM

Convicted One
Just because the car has a max rating of 630,000 lbs, is no guarantee that is the intended loading, is it?



   Of course, they don't have to load the car to it's fullest weight capacity.  If the cars show up somewhere like here, Sioux Falls, S.D., off the beaten path,  I'd have to think they were special ordered to carry something that took advantage of their heavier loading capacity.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:27 AM
Dale, I haven't really checked, but I suspect that depressed-center cars have to be heavier because of the extra support needed on account of losing a solid center sill. Given that, if you needed to haul a load of the same weight, you'd probably accomplish it with added axles, and the added length needed to accommodate them.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:30 AM
Murphy Siding

   Of course, they don't have to load the car to it's fullest weight capacity.  If the cars show up somewhere like here, Sioux Falls, S.D., off the beaten path,  I'd have to think they were special ordered to carry something that took advantage of their heavier loading capacity.
Or, they could just be stored there, either because it's an available siding or in anticipation of some large load that's not quite ready for shipment yet.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:32 AM

nanaimo73

Carl,

Is it possible to have a flat car capable of hauling the same load but with a depressed center for tall loads, with roughly the same car weight, or are depressed center cars usually heavier?

 

 

I would expect a depressed center flat to be heavier due to the extra steel needed to strengthen the depressed area. 

Two heavy transformers are enroute to Excel Energy's Monticello nuclear plant, north of Minneapolis, right now, they should make the final move to the plant today. One is on a heavy depressed center flat

Transformer move

 

The other is heavier and required a small Schnabel car.

Second Transformer

 

These pictures were taken by Dennis Weber near LaCrosse, WI on the BNSF on Saturday May 8th.

 

John Beaulieu

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:26 AM

CShaveRR
Murphy Siding

   Of course, they don't have to load the car to it's fullest weight capacity.  If the cars show up somewhere like here, Sioux Falls, S.D., off the beaten path,  I'd have to think they were special ordered to carry something that took advantage of their heavier loading capacity.
Or, they could just be stored there, either because it's an available siding or in anticipation of some large load that's not quite ready for shipment yet.

 

Like DDA40X 6925 in Chamberlain?   Tongue

Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:12 AM

nanaimo73

CShaveRR
Or, they could just be stored there, either because it's an available siding or in anticipation of some large load that's not quite ready for shipment yet.

 

Like DDA40X 6925 in Chamberlain?   Tongue

  Chances are,  they'd move that future museum piece using the wheels that are already under it.Wink

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:20 AM

    The cars are gone this morning.  Where they were sitting was an often used siding parallel to the BNSF main downtown.  Cars staged there are never around very long.

     Looking around,  I saw a pile of brand new sewer pipe, close enough to the railyard that they could have conceivably been shipped by rail.  Normally, it seems like plastic sewer pipe would be a reletively light load.  This pipe seems to be joined together in long lengths.  It sort of looks like the sewer pipe equivilent of CWR.  It will be interesting to see how it gets to the construction site.

     Is it possible, that this pipe was hauled on thses cars, spread out over many carlengths, similar to CWR?  It would seem like any old flatcar would do for that sort of thing.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:03 PM

Carl and Dale;

Here is a link to the kind of depressed center flat being discussed.  Maybe it'll help?

http://cs.trains.com/trccs/forums/t/173836.aspx

 

 


 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:08 PM

I guess I just fat fingered the keyboard--Where's Eleanor Roosevelt when you need her?BlindfoldBanged Head

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,901 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:29 PM

Murphy Siding
Normally, it seems like plastic sewer pipe would be a reletively light load.  This pipe seems to be joined together in long lengths.  It sort of looks like the sewer pipe equivilent of CWR.  It will be interesting to see how it gets to the construction site.

Sometimes to save shipping costs PVC pipe will be sleeved one in another I've seen up to 6 that way but usually only 4. Must be the required diameter (inside) goes upstream first and then the larger maybe(?) saving the extra PVC costs vs shipping costs? Sewer and storm water pipe usually white.  There may be an adapter involved. Water pipe (usually green in color) often is shipped that way also.

CL9000 water pipe is very heavy. If the pipe was white a long length of the bell allows for some movement of the pipe without it separating. Some locations in CA have bell lengths of 2 ft.  

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:41 PM

    I guess I've been refering to this as sewer pipe because it's black. Right now, there is a big water project going on in our part of the state, so we see that big green water pipe everywhere- including unit trains of it being delivered.  There's also a big sewer project starting downtown near the rail yard.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,901 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:24 PM

Murphy Siding

    I guess I've been refering to this as sewer pipe because it's black. Right now, there is a big water project going on in our part of the state, so we see that big green water pipe everywhere- including unit trains of it being delivered.  There's also a big sewer project starting downtown near the rail yard.

Are you sure that it is PVC pipe? All the black pipe I have ever worked with was called ductile Iron pipe  (DIP) even though it has a completely smooth  inner liner and is outside steel pipe. . It can be a very smooth looking pipe from the outside. DIP will be used for all types of fluid flow usually in locations crossing wet lands, streams, heavy rock infested ditches, and will be bolted to each section with a ring on the male and female sections to keep it from shifting and making a break. Some districts will require the DIP to be painted and / or identification tapes placed over them in a ditch. White -  sewer, Grey -  Grey water, Green  - potable water, Yellow - Natural gas, Orange - telephone and control conduit ( RR signal conduit) (sometimes Fiber). Other colors I'm not aware. 

Earthquake areas I understand have longer bells on PVC and DIP so earth movements will not break the seal. If you can estimate or measure the bell depth its purpose might be obvious.   

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:59 PM

Murphy Siding


   Of course, they don't have to load the car to it's fullest weight capacity.  If the cars show up somewhere like here, Sioux Falls, S.D., off the beaten path,  I'd have to think they were special ordered to carry something that took advantage of their heavier loading capacity.

 

It just seems to me that I recall reading that while the class ones have the immediate resources available to make their mains "286K friendly"...many of the regionals do not, and in consequence their deficiencies might shut them out from interchange with the bigger loads.

 

Such a car as we are talking about might (for instance) allow a 280K shipment to continue on over a connection with a "deficient" regional line having a restricted capacity?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:18 AM

Convicted One

Murphy Siding


   Of course, they don't have to load the car to it's fullest weight capacity.  If the cars show up somewhere like here, Sioux Falls, S.D., off the beaten path,  I'd have to think they were special ordered to carry something that took advantage of their heavier loading capacity.

 

It just seems to me that I recall reading that while the class ones have the immediate resources available to make their mains "286K friendly"...many of the regionals do not, and in consequence their deficiencies might shut them out from interchange with the bigger loads.

 

Such a car as we are talking about might (for instance) allow a 280K shipment to continue on over a connection with a "deficient" regional line having a restricted capacity?

  I see what you mean now.  Those cars were probably unloaded off the BNSF main line.  The 2 local railroads, Ellis & Eastern, and Dakota & Iowa are both heavy rock haulers, so they'd probably be stout enough to carry heavy axle loads.  Of course, there's the possibility that the pipe came from a shipper on a light capacity railroad.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:23 AM

blue streak 1

Are you sure that it is PVC pipe? All the black pipe I have ever worked with was called ductile Iron pipe  (DIP) even though it has a completely smooth  inner liner and is outside steel pipe. . It can be a very smooth looking pipe from the outside. DIP will be used for all types of fluid flow usually in locations crossing wet lands, streams, heavy rock infested ditches, and will be bolted to each section with a ring on the male and female sections to keep it from shifting and making a break. Some districts will require the DIP to be painted and / or identification tapes placed over them in a ditch. White -  sewer, Grey -  Grey water, Green  - potable water, Yellow - Natural gas, Orange - telephone and control conduit ( RR signal conduit) (sometimes Fiber). Other colors I'm not aware. 

Earthquake areas I understand have longer bells on PVC and DIP so earth movements will not break the seal. If you can estimate or measure the bell depth its purpose might be obvious.  

  I think you may have found my answer.  The pipe is accross a river, so the actual details are a little hard to pin down.  They doappear to  have some sort of fatter connector where the sections go together,  perhaps a ring type affair, with bolts.  The area that the sewer pipe is being replaced is in an old part of town.  It runs through an area of near solid Sioux Quartzite.  A couple of years ago,  replacing the old 8" pipe with 16-20" (?) pipe further down the same street required some dynomite excavating.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,794 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:11 AM

If it were spun fibreglass pipe (Hobas) it would . Yellow-brown in color. (You can jack that stuff without hurting it -can't always say that for the blue-green heavy plastic stuff)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,901 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:50 AM

mudchicken

If it were spun fibreglass pipe (Hobas) it would . Yellow-brown in color. (You can jack that stuff without hurting it -can't always say that for the blue-green heavy plastic stuff)

MC: Around here we always jack with a steel casion pipe because of the possibility of hitting rock. then we insert the actual carrier pipe inside with diameter 2 -4" less than the casion  Sometime I wonder if we compete with New Hampshire for being the granite state. My wife's old house was on Granite St. and she had a granite out cropping right under the house.

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy