Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
3 foot gauge with standard gauge components?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="santafe347"]I am helping a friend design a 3 foot gauge farm railway, and in order to save money for us, I was wondering if it was possible to use standard gauge track components for 3 foot gauge.[/quote]</P> <P mce_keep="true"> </P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>I assume your friend’s plan is to build a sort of hobby or estate railroad with no functional purpose other than to ride on for enjoyment.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If this is the case, there is no particular prototype standard, even though a specific gauge has been selected.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>A 3-foot-gauge could carry people even if built to a very light pattern.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Rail as light as 16-pound would work fine.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Small mine tram wheels or even Fairmont stamped and drawn motorcar wheels would easily handle the load.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Ties on the order of 6” x 6” or smaller with small spikes or screw clips would suffice.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Lots of compromises such as the omission of springs are possible when building to this light pattern.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Other than wheels and rail, all metalwork can be fabricated from scratch.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Building to this light pattern fulfills the objective to ride on a train of sorts, but it lacks the charm of something more authentic to the medium to heavy prototypes.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Nevertheless, building a hobby railroad is a lot of work and expense, so the compromises are very attractive to some people.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>Railroad prototypes such as D&RGW and EBT are at the heavy end of the pattern range, using heavy cast iron 24” diameter wheels and rail in the 60-85-pound range.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Acquiring prototype rolling stock or a locomotive in that heavy pattern, and transporting it to your site will no doubt entail serious costs.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I agree with Paul’s advice about contacting EBT to see if they would sell you anything.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Other than that, there are sometimes ads in Live Steam magazine offering a supply of relatively light rail, trucks, wheelsets, etc.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I agree with Henry that too large of rail can look ungainly, but that is sort of the look of narrow gauge.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>A lot of the components of narrow gauge are relative large when compared to the same components in standard gauge systems.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>When using extra heavy rail, it helps the look to use the heaviest ties and spikes you can find such as those used on standard gauge mainlines.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It also helps the look to use heavy, deep rock ballast.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I kind of like the look of those extra heavy components in narrow gauge track.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>If I were starting from scratch, buying all the rail and track components, I would not select the heaviest pattern.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Instead, I would use rail around 60-pound and standard gauge ties and spikes.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But if I had a free supply of 100-pound rail, I would use it and build the heaviest pattern.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva size=2></FONT></SPAN> </P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT size=2><FONT face=verdana,geneva>I have seen some few photos of the Drummond Mine railroad in Columbia, SA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I am guessing that it is about the highest capacity 3-foot-gauge operation in existence.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I wonder what size rail they use.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Maybe you could get exact measurements or the rolling numbers off of that WM rail and somebody here could tell you more about it. Did the WM leave any joint bars or track bolts? </SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy