Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Fuel Efficiency: Barges over Trains
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva size=2>I just skimmed the article at the newsstand, so I need to ask, what does the article conclude beyond the winner of the fuel efficiency contest?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I am sure that all three forms of transport are as fuel-efficient as they can be in economic terms.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Is there an onus to go beyond the economic limits of fuel efficiency?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></SPAN></P> <P mce_keep="true"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva size=2>In pure economic terms, including fuel cost, it seems to me that each of the three forms, where they are being applied, is better than the other two.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So I am not sure I understand the point of comparing their fuel efficiency.</FONT></SPAN></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy