Trains.com

Kismet Wreck

4713 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Kismet Wreck
Posted by ericsp on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:38 PM

I see that the NTSB still does not have a report for the Kismet wreck (June 2006) on its website. I wonder what is taking so long for this report.

I heard that a rule of thumb is that it usually takes the NTSB about a year to finish an investigation and write a report. From looking at the more recent accidents, it appears that it now takes about two years. 

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:57 PM

Not all railroad incidents result in NTSB investigations.  Not all NTSB investigations result in NTSB reports.  Not all NTSB reports are published.  Call or email the NTSB and they can tell you what they did and what they intend to do or have already done.  Given there were no fatalities, no passengers, no hazmat release, and the probable cause is neither indicative of a new trend nor unusual, the NTSB may have seen no reason to investigate in detail.

Here's the FRA report:

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/Accident_Investigation/2006/hq200648v.pdf

RWM

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:47 AM

Thanks 

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:37 PM

Railway Man

I noticed that the report stated that Crew #1 had not endorsed the signals called in the accident area on thier Switch Awareness Form...I wasn't aware that crews are required to place any more than information concerning their handling of Main Track hand throw switches on the form.  Is this a BNSF only requirement?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: california
  • 45 posts
Posted by BNSF_Conductor11 on Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:17 PM

BaltACD

Railway Man

I noticed that the report stated that Crew #1 had not endorsed the signals called in the accident area on thier Switch Awareness Form...I wasn't aware that crews are required to place any more than information concerning their handling of Main Track hand throw switches on the form.  Is this a BNSF only requirement?

 

 

yes BNSF has what they call signal awareness forms for any signaled territory and we keep a record of position of switches only if we are in TWC or ABSTWC territory.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:44 PM

BaltACD

Railway Man

I noticed that the report stated that Crew #1 had not endorsed the signals called in the accident area on thier Switch Awareness Form...I wasn't aware that crews are required to place any more than information concerning their handling of Main Track hand throw switches on the form.  Is this a BNSF only requirement?

The UP uses a conductor's report form where signal indications more restrictive than clear, delays, defect detector responses and, where required hand operated switch information. 

Missing entries is a nice way of saying the person maintaining the log wasn't alert and attentive.  

Jeff 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy