Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why are GE locomotives better than EMD?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
O.K., now before anybody gets "bent outta shape", I just want to say that I am NOT an expert, and I'm not sure how many similarities there are between ALCO, and GE, (they did share a lot of traits, even were partners at one time), But, if you have ever witnessed an Alco RS-3 switching cars alongside an EMD Geep, the Alco loads up much faster. I have been an "unofficial" engineer on both Alco S-4's, and EMD SW-1200's. I can report the same for those two also. I understand that GE has, in the interest of emmissions, programmed the fuel flow in such a way as to reduce the amount of smoke that was so common among earlier "U-boats". That is something that is inherent with the 4-cycle diesel. It's called "Turbo-Lag". (More fuel than air, during rapid power increase). Anyone who has seen a tractor-pull, will compare this with the multi-turbo John-Deeres that send a column of black smoke a hundred feet in the air. <br />As for who actually makes the better locomotive, you would have to talk to everybody from engineers, to shop foremen, to cost accountants, to dispatchers, etc,etc, etc.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy