Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="zardoz"]So even if he made his stop under an approach aspect, once he saw the next signal to be clear, he could then proceed at normal speed.[/quote] That would be my take on it. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> If the final light were red, Sanchez violated it by passing it, and he also violated the preceding solid yellow by exceeding “approach” speed after leaving the station.  But if the final light were green, I don’t see where Sanchez violated any signal.   <o:p></o:p> In either case, I don’t know of any evidence that he violated the flashing yellow, which was the first of the three signals.   I think it was significant that railfans and/or bystanders at the station said they saw the final light as green.  However, it seems very significant that the conductor of the train has now stated that he saw the final signal as green.  Possible ulterior motive notwithstanding, he would have high credibility as the conductor of the train, to not have mistakenly interpreted the signal aspect.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag