Trains.com

Sullavan Co. 22 Car Train Derailment... Wow.

4144 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Sullavan Co. 22 Car Train Derailment... Wow.
Posted by bubbajustin on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 7:20 PM

http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=10664593

On TV thay think foul play was involved. Care to elaborate? Whay were thay storing cars full of potash??? Also is it an actual parking system or the hand break?

Feel free to discuss this!

Justin

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 11:29 PM

bubbajustin

http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=10664593

On TV thay think foul play was involved. Care to elaborate? Whay were thay storing cars full of potash??? Also is it an actual parking system or the hand break?

Feel free to discuss this!

Justin

On TV they B idiots.

Thank you for permission to discuss this.  I think it was caused by a solar flare.

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 11:57 PM
Can someone spell check that for me? I dunt undarstend

ML

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 5:19 AM

Depending on how long the cars in question were stored there (assuming the news station got that right) someone could very well have released handbrakes.  If air was bled off when these cars were stored, wouldn't they have been 'double' braked with handbrakes tied on also?  I've heard of some locals switching out industries speak of wheel chocks.  Would a set or two (more?) have helped in a situation like this?  Hard to say without knowing the grade of the tracks in question I suppose.

Dan

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:04 AM

 Why would hoppers loaded with potash be placed in long-term storage instead of being delivered to a consumer?  This story doesn't make sense in that respect.  Potash is used as fertilizer, so it seems more logical for the cars to be delivered somewhere for emptying before being placed in long-term storage.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:14 AM

I would think there's adverse effects from leaving a fertilizer in a car like that for an extended period of time, both to the quality of the product and maybe to the car.  Good thought.

Dan

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:46 AM

greyhounds
I think it was caused by a solar flare.

Nah, it was caused by Sasquatch looking for fertilizer for his garden.
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:13 AM

Laugh That's Grassman around here/

 

That's what I wondered Dan. Why would they store those cars "long term" if still loaded with potash? If the cars were sitting on a hill, I do imagine that they would use chalks. Evan if thay werent I think that those cars would have there hand brake set, and the breakes charged.

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:25 AM

The Indiana Rail Road often stores loaded cars for delivery when a customer is found.  Really, not at all that unusual.

Gabe

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:11 AM

I believe there's an general railroad operating rule that prohibits parking a cut of cars 'on the air', at least for a period of time longer than several hours. 

Perhaps one of the members here who's more familiar with it can confirm and elaborate, esp. the rationale for the rule.  I could see the purpose of that rule being so that crews won't get into the habit or practice of relying on the air only to hold the cars in place.  Why ?  Because you just know that sooner or later, there's going to be a car or cut of cars where the air leaks off faster than anyone anticipated, and without an adequate number of hand brakes being set and/ or chock[s] in place, then away they go . . .

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:17 AM

Aside from the wording of the news report, there is nothing unusual in the storage cars "in transit".  I would assume that for long time "parking"  there would be hand brakes and chocks and no air, and if on a siding, there could possibly be a derail in addition to a switch both of which would have to be set for the move or otherwise negotiated without derailment. 

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:31 AM

henry6

Aside from the wording of the news report, there is nothing unusual in the storage cars "in transit".  I would assume that for long time "parking"  there would be hand brakes and chocks and no air, and if on a siding, there could possibly be a derail in addition to a switch both of which would have to be set for the move or otherwise negotiated without derailment. 

I think you hit the nail on the head about the wording being part of the issue here.  Perhaps these were stored "on air" but I suspect we'd have to wait for a report from an investigator to find out.

Dan

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:32 AM

Paul_D_North_Jr

I believe there's an general railroad operating rule that prohibits parking a cut of cars 'on the air', at least for a period of time longer than several hours. 

Perhaps one of the members here who's more familiar with it can confirm and elaborate, esp. the rationale for the rule.  I could see the purpose of that rule being so that crews won't get into the habit or practice of relying on the air only to hold the cars in place.  Why ?  Because you just know that sooner or later, there's going to be a car or cut of cars where the air leaks off faster than anyone anticipated, and without an adequate number of hand brakes being set and/ or chock[s] in place, then away they go . . .

- Paul North.

Paul, you answered your own question (correctly).

Although another reason for the wheel chocks is vandalism--people releasing handbrakes and/or bleeding the air. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:41 AM

Since our "yard" is on a grade, we always set a couple of brakes on our consist, not to mention the handbrake on the locomotive.  We also throw down a chock.

It's not at all unusual to leave the consist at 5 pm with a full service application (assuming the locomotive is still attached), or an emergency application (if we broke the locomotive off the train for some reason) and arrive the next morning to find all of the air brakes released.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, July 9, 2009 10:38 AM

CNW 6000

I would think there's adverse effects from leaving a fertilizer in a car like that for an extended period of time, both to the quality of the product and maybe to the car.  Good thought.

Customers will frequently get a 'buy' on a high volume of product and then lease track space from the railroad to store it until the product can be sold through it's normal channels.  I would be interesting to know if the cars involved were of railroad or private ownership.  Railroad owned cars would be subject to demurrage, private owner cars would be subject to the terms of the trip lease that they operate on.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 12:20 PM

tree68

Since our "yard" is on a grade, we always set a couple of brakes on our consist, not to mention the handbrake on the locomotive.  We also throw down a chock.

It's not at all unusual to leave the consist at 5 pm with a full service application (assuming the locomotive is still attached), or an emergency application (if we broke the locomotive off the train for some reason) and arrive the next morning to find all of the air brakes released.

 

Tree I imagine you always set handbrakes because even if it is only to set out a car something may interfeer with you getting back to that part of the train?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, July 9, 2009 12:31 PM

blue streak 1

Tree - I imagine you always set handbrakes because even if it is only to set out a car something may interfere with you getting back to that part of the train?

We're only working with passenger cars.  If we're in station and the locomotive will be remaining on-line, we may not set a brake.

However, for two of our trips each day we have to perform a run-around at each end.  At the station the cars are usually empty - no passengers or crew, so no one to catch an extra brake if needed.  Far better to set them in the first place.

At the distant end of the trip, the cars are occupied, and we keep someone on the train. 

Either way, it's not desirable to have the cars roll on us, so at least one, and sometimes two, brakes will be set on the consist, even though the cars will be in emergency once the break is made.

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Thursday, July 9, 2009 2:59 PM

.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Thursday, July 9, 2009 5:55 PM

Ok so I bet that it was the hand breaks. Seems thay should put a lock on them.

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 10, 2009 9:35 AM

The railroad cars left their parking spot and traveled under their own power southwest nearly 4.5 miles to the end of the spur line in eastern Sullivan County

Who put the traction motors on the rolling stock? Or did they mean rolled? Whistling

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, July 10, 2009 9:48 AM

TrainManTy
Who put the traction motors on the rolling stock? Or did they mean rolled? Whistling

See, the tops of the cars are flat which is where the solar panels go that power the traction motors.  Unless they were BioDiesel powered, hauling fertilizer and all...lol.

Dan

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, July 10, 2009 4:01 PM

bubbajustin

Ok so I bet that it was the hand breaks. Seems thay should put a lock on them.

Putting a lock on the hand BRAKES would only work until someone cut or sawed the lock off.  It might slow 'em down but wouldn't stop someone IMO.

Dan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy