Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Passenger Trains
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Paul, <br /> <br />I don't think anyone is chanting 'Kill Amtrak'. A minority of us are saying let it sink or swim on its own. I imagine most of y'all know it will not swim. <br /> <br />I believe the NEC should be funded by the passengers as would happen in a private system. Since I doubt the ridership would be adequate to make that happen, then let the cities and/or counties help support the system. Then the people who benifit from the system will essentially pay for the system. <br /> <br />I think the same with regard to the other portions of Amtrak. Either go 100% private or let the localities subsidize it. <br /> <br />I believe the 100% private system is best because all of the cost of the ticket goes back to the company to cover the costs. If you funnel tax dollars through the government, only a fraction gets to the train company. Since the government entity is not adding value, it is only a drain on the market efficiency of the transportation system. <br /> <br />I regret the possible loss of jobs at Amtrak, but that can not be anything but a tiny concern in this debate. Nobody weeps for the buggy whip makers displaced by an automobile industry. <br /> <br />Ed
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy