Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Merger positions from the 4 major railroads
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Some interesting points concerning mergers; <br />If you fly from Atlanta to Denver on Delta Air lines , you go all the way on Delta , no interchange with another air carrier. If a shipper gives Roadway or Yellow 4 pallets of freight in Penn. to go to Texas, they will deliver all the way with no interchange. If a shipper gives J B Hunt or Schneider a truckload in North Carolina for Utah they will go all the way without interchange. The same goes for UPS, Fedex, etc. If a shipper gives a container to Maersk SeaLand in China for Chicago there is no interchange to another carrier. Same for P&O from Europe to Texas. Railroads are the only transport system where the major portion of the freight is interchanged between separate companies. That is why the mergers will come. The shipper customers want them. <br />I did not agree with the UP-SP merger and the breakup of Conrail. If these events had not occured, then we would have had three railroads in the east and three in the west and then three transcon railroads instead of just two. That would have been a better situation for competition. BNSF and Conrail together would have been very interesting.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy